Cited by 15Climate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsHydrological Forecasting Using AI

Evaluating the performances of SVR and XGBoost for short-range forecasting of heatwaves across different temperature zones of India

Open access
Bhoopathi, Srikanth, Kumar, Nitish, Somesh, Pal, Manali·2024·Applied Computing and Geosciences

Abstract

This research aims to forecast maximum temperatures and the frequency of heatwave days across four different temperature zones (Zone 1, 2, 3 and 4) in India. These four zones are categorized based on the 30-year average maximum temperatures (T 30AMT ) during the summer months of April, May, and June (AMJ). Two Machine Learning (ML) algorithms eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) are employed to achieve this goal. The study utilizes nine key atmospheric variables namely air temperature, geopotential height, relative humidity, U-wind, V-wind, soil moisture, solar radiation, sea surface temperature, and mean sea level pressure at a daily scale spanning from 1991 to 2020 for the months of March, April, May, and June as predictors. The India Meteorological Department daily maximum temperature data spanning from 1991 to 2020 for the months of AMJ serves as the predictands. ML models are developed using spatially averaged atmospheric variables and daily maximum temperature across the grids falling within each temperature zone. Results indicate that for a 7-day lead time, SVR outperforms XGBoost in Zone-1 (T 30AMT > 38 °C) and Zone-2 (T 30AMT : 35.01 °C–38 °C) by more accurately capturing peak temperatures during training and testing. Conversely, for a 15-day lead time in Zone-1, XGBoost better predicts temperature peaks in both phases. In Zone-3 (T 30AMT : 30 °C–35 °C) and Zone-4 (T 30AMT < 30 °C) for both lead times, the performance of both models decline, indicating models and input variables are more effective in predicting higher temperatures typical of Zone-1 and 2 but less so in Zone-3 and 4. In a nutshell, the study attempts to highlight the capability of advanced ML techniques combined with spatial climate data to enhance the prediction of extreme heatwave events. These insights can aid in heatwave preparedness, climate management, and adaptation strategies for different Indian temperature zones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acags.2024.100204

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prediction accuracy and heatwave projection greatly depend on the persistence of events in terms of temporal dependencies of the time series data.

    “the prediction accuracy and heatwave projection greatly depend on the persistence of events in terms of temporal dependencies of the time series data.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhoopathi, S., Kumar, N., Somesh, & Pal, M.
Affiliations
National Institute of Technology Warangal (IN)
Corresponding author
Pal, Manali
Venue
Applied Computing and Geosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
24
Pages
100204
ISSN
2590-1974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403680429
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Computing and Geosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Keywords
heatwave prediction, maximum temperature, heatwave frequency, support vector regression, XGBoost, climate predictors, lead time, heatwave preparedness, climate change adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review