Evaluating the performances of SVR and XGBoost for short-range forecasting of heatwaves across different temperature zones of India
Open accessAbstract
This research aims to forecast maximum temperatures and the frequency of heatwave days across four different temperature zones (Zone 1, 2, 3 and 4) in India. These four zones are categorized based on the 30-year average maximum temperatures (T 30AMT ) during the summer months of April, May, and June (AMJ). Two Machine Learning (ML) algorithms eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) are employed to achieve this goal. The study utilizes nine key atmospheric variables namely air temperature, geopotential height, relative humidity, U-wind, V-wind, soil moisture, solar radiation, sea surface temperature, and mean sea level pressure at a daily scale spanning from 1991 to 2020 for the months of March, April, May, and June as predictors. The India Meteorological Department daily maximum temperature data spanning from 1991 to 2020 for the months of AMJ serves as the predictands. ML models are developed using spatially averaged atmospheric variables and daily maximum temperature across the grids falling within each temperature zone. Results indicate that for a 7-day lead time, SVR outperforms XGBoost in Zone-1 (T 30AMT > 38 °C) and Zone-2 (T 30AMT : 35.01 °C–38 °C) by more accurately capturing peak temperatures during training and testing. Conversely, for a 15-day lead time in Zone-1, XGBoost better predicts temperature peaks in both phases. In Zone-3 (T 30AMT : 30 °C–35 °C) and Zone-4 (T 30AMT < 30 °C) for both lead times, the performance of both models decline, indicating models and input variables are more effective in predicting higher temperatures typical of Zone-1 and 2 but less so in Zone-3 and 4. In a nutshell, the study attempts to highlight the capability of advanced ML techniques combined with spatial climate data to enhance the prediction of extreme heatwave events. These insights can aid in heatwave preparedness, climate management, and adaptation strategies for different Indian temperature zones.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prediction accuracy and heatwave projection greatly depend on the persistence of events in terms of temporal dependencies of the time series data.
“the prediction accuracy and heatwave projection greatly depend on the persistence of events in terms of temporal dependencies of the time series data.”
From Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for heatwave event prediction in India (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Cites
Deep Learning-Based Extreme Heatwave Forecast
Jacques-Dumas, V., Ragone, F., Borgnat, P., Abry, P., & Bouchet, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.789641 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Khan, N., Shahid, S., Ismail, T. B., & Behlil, F. (2021) · Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment · doi:10.1007/s00477-020-01963-1 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches for heatwave event prediction in India
V, R. C., Johnvictor, A. C., & N, P. S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-04634-9 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bhoopathi, S., Kumar, N., Somesh, & Pal, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Technology Warangal (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Pal, Manali
- Venue
- Applied Computing and Geosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 100204
- ISSN
- 2590-1974 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403680429
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Computing and Geosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
- Keywords
- heatwave prediction, maximum temperature, heatwave frequency, support vector regression, XGBoost, climate predictors, lead time, heatwave preparedness, climate change adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review