Relationship of Library Assessment to Student Retention
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mezick found no statistically significant correlations between indicators of a culture of assessment in ARL member libraries and retention.
“Mezick found no statistically significant correlations between indicators of a culture of assessment in member libraries (such as longevity of library assessment activities or the provision of assessment training for library employees) and retention.”
From The Value of Academic Libraries: Library Services as a Predictor of Student Retention (2016) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Soria, K. M., Fransen, J., & Nackerud, S. (2013) · portal: Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2013.0010 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
The Role of the Academic Library in Promoting Student Engagement in Learning
Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2003) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.64.4.256 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Value of Academic Libraries: Library Services as a Predictor of Student Retention
Murray, A., Ireland, A., & Hackathorn, J. (2016) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.77.5.631 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The Impact of Library Instruction on Undergraduate Student Success: A Four-Year Study
Rowe, J., Leuzinger, J., Hargis, C., & Harker, K. (2021) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.82.1.7 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mezick, E. M.
- Affiliations
- Long Island University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mezick, Elizabeth M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Academic Librarianship
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-36
- ISSN
- 0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089995217
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 17.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- library evaluation, student retention, student persistence, academic libraries, learning outcomes, research libraries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
