Structuring better services for unstructured data: Academic libraries are key to an ethical research data future with big data
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings are consistent with previous studies that position libraries as key actors in data governance and sustainability.
“These findings are consistent with previous studies that position libraries as key actors in data governance and sustainability.”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Laskowski (2021)
These findings are consistent with previous studies linking librarians' data practices to institutional evaluation and decision-making.
“These findings are consistent with previous studies linking librarians' data practices to institutional evaluation and decision-making.”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Laskowski (2021)
Laskowski (2021) and Shahzad et al. (2024) associate data practices with institutional analytics and decision support.
“Luo and Tang (2024) demonstrate that analytics, curation, and visualisation enhance library assessment capabilities, while Laskowski (2021) and Shahzad et al. (2024) associate data practices with institutional analytics and decision support.”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Laskowski (2021)
Laskowski (2021) and Cox et al. (2019b) highlight librarians' roles in risk management, policy development, and compliance frameworks.
“Laskowski (2021) and Cox et al. (2019b) highlight librarians' roles in risk management, policy development, and compliance frameworks.”
From Librarians’ roles and responsibilities in managing data within academic libraries: A role-based data governance model (2026) · cites this paper as Laskowski (2021)
Cites
Harford, T. (2014) · Significance · doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2014.00778.x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ayoib, A., Ismail, M. A., & Abdullah, N. (2026) · Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science · doi:10.22452/mjlis.vol31no1.2
“…maintain data quality through metadata and documentation practices, and support long-term preservation and reuse (Ashiq et al., 2021; Bishop et al., 2022; Dube, 2025; Ho et al., 2025; Zainal et al., 2023; Cox et al., 2019b; Ismail et al., 2024; Laskowski, 2021; Ohaji, 2016; Rabasa & Abrizah, 2022).”
- Authors
- Laskowski, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Academic Librarianship
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 102335
- ISSN
- 0099-1333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3134384350
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Academic Librarianship (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- research data management, academic libraries, big data, unstructured data, research ethics, institutional leadership, research support services, higher education institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
