The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence-Based Milestones for Surveillance of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Development
Open accessAbstract
Objective Fewer than half of the nation's pediatricians conduct systematic surveillance of young children's development. Because time and cost are among the barriers, our objective was to create a brief set of parent-report questions about cognitive, motor, and language milestones that is freely available and can be administered and scored quickly.Methods A team of experts developed candidate items after reviewing existing instruments and prior research. We selected final items based on statistical fit to a graded item response model developed and replicated in separate samples enrolled from primary care settings (n = 469 and 308, respectively). We then developed a 10-item form for each visit on the pediatric periodicity schedule. Combining our initial samples with 395 families enrolled from referral clinics, we tested these forms' concurrent validity with respect to the ASQ-3 and parent reports of developmental diagnoses.Results A final set of 54 items displayed adequate fit to our statistical model regardless of race/ethnicity, education level, and child gender. Beginning at 4 months, scores on 10-item forms displayed consistent associations with the ASQ-3, and all but the 60-month form detected parents' reports of developmental delay with adequate sensitivity and specificity.Conclusions The Milestones is one element of the Survey of Well-being of Young Children (SWYC), a brief but comprehensive screening instrument for children under 5 years. The Milestones is a set of evidence-based items with individual normative data that are appropriate for pediatric surveillance. In addition, the scoring of 10-item Milestones forms may provide many advantages of a first level developmental screening instrument.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, variability across surveillance resources, including the CDC’s, can create confusion regarding what constitutes a concern and when developmental screening between recommended ages might be warranted.3,4,38,76”
From Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2000) · Cited by 4,106
Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008
Boyle, C. A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L. A., Cohen, R. A., Blumberg, S. J., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., Visser, S., & Kogan, M. D. (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2989 · Cited by 1,732
Pediatrics, S. O. D. B. (2006) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1231 · Cited by 1,472
Application of a Method of Estimating DIF for Polytomous Test Items
Camilli, G., & Congdon, P. D. (1999) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986024004323 · Cited by 607
Rosenberg, S. A., Zhang, D., & Robinson, C. C. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-1680 · Cited by 429
Differential Item Functioning Analysis With Ordinal Logistic Regression Techniques
Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Jolley, L., & van Belle, G. (2006) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245183.28384.ed · Cited by 285
A Generalized Hosmer–Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test for Multinomial Logistic Regression Models
Fagerland, M. W., & Hosmer, D. W. (2012) · The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x1201200307 · Cited by 274
Impact of Implementing Developmental Screening at 12 and 24 Months in a Pediatric Practice
Hix‐Small, H., Marks, K., Squires, J., & Nickel, R. E. (2007) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3583 · Cited by 197
Limbos, M. M., & Joyce, D. P. (2011) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/dbp.0b013e31822552e9 · Cited by 172
Weatherston, D. J. (2001) · Psychoanalytic Social Work · doi:10.1300/j032v08n01_04 · Cited by 153
Schonwald, A., Huntington, N. L., Chan, E., Risko, W., & Bridgemohan, C. F. (2009) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2798 · Cited by 137
Logistic Regression and Its Use in Detecting Differential Item Functioning in Polytomous Items
French, A. W., & Miller, T. R. (1996) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00495.x · Cited by 134
DIF Detection and Effect Size Measures for Polytomously Scored Items
Kim, S., Cohen, A. S., Alagoz, C., & Kim, S. (2007) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00029.x · Cited by 87
Sheldrick, R. C., Henson, B. S., Merchant, S., Neger, E. N., Murphy, J. M., & Perrin, E. C. (2012) · Academic Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2012.06.008 · Cited by 87
Self-citationSheldrick, R. C., Henson, B. S., Neger, E. N., Merchant, S., Murphy, J. M., & Perrin, E. C. (2012) · Academic Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.acap.2012.08.003 · Cited by 83
Self-citationRutter, M. L. (1989) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/016502548901200101 · Cited by 73
An Abbreviated Screening Instrument for Autism Spectrum Disorders
Smith, N. J., Sheldrick, R. C., & Perrin, E. C. (2012) · Infant Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1002/imhj.21356 · Cited by 69
Self-citationDrachler, M. D. L., Marshall, T., & Leite, J. C. D. C. (2007) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00787.x · Cited by 66
Thomas, S. A., Cotton, W. H., Pan, X. J., & Ratliff-Schaub, K. L. (2011) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/0009922811420711 · Cited by 34
Appropriate and Inappropriate Interpretation and Use of Test Scores in Early Intervention
Andersson, L. (2004) · Journal of Early Intervention · doi:10.1177/105381510402700105 · Cited by 17
Comparison of four statistical approaches to score child development: a study of Malawian children
Cheung, Y., Gladstone, M., Maleta, K. M., Duan, X., & Ashorn, P. (2008) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02104.x · Cited by 8
Bootstrap and Traditional Standard Errors of the Point-Biserial
Harris, D. J., & Kolen, M. J. (1988) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316448804800106 · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Identification, Evaluation, and Management of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Hyman, S. L., Levy, S. E., Myers, S. M., COUNCIL ON CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES, S. O. D. A. B. P., Kuo, D. Z., Apkon, S., Davidson, L. F., Ellerbeck, K. A., Foster, J. E. A., Noritz, G. H., et al. (2020) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2019-3447 · Cited by 1,798
Chung, E. K., Siegel, B., Garg, A., Conroy, K., Gross, R. S., Long, D., Lewis, G., Osman, C., Messito, M. J., Wade, R., et al. (2016) · Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care · doi:10.1016/j.cppeds.2016.02.004 · Cited by 318
Incorporating Recognition and Management of Perinatal Depression Into Pediatric Practice
Rafferty, J. R., Mattson, G. L., Earls, M. F., Yogman, M. W., Gambon, T. B., Lavin, A., & Wissow, L. S. (2018) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3260 · Cited by 279
Walhovd, K. B., Fjell, A. M., Giedd, J. N., Dale, A. M., & Brown, T. T. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv301 · Cited by 248
Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools
Zubler, J. M., Wiggins, L. D., Macias, M. M., Whitaker, T. M., Shaw, J. S., Squires, J. K., Pajek, J. A., Wolf, R. B., Slaughter, K. S., Broughton, A. S., et al. (2022) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2021-052138 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheldrick, R. C., & Perrin, E. C.
- Affiliations
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Academic Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 577-586
- ISSN
- 1876-2859 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3993976
- OpenAlex
- W2116435785
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Academic Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Fund
- Tufts Medical Center
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (KM1CA156726)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (L40 HD077786)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child and Adolescent Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- developmental milestones, child development monitoring, developmental screening, cognitive development, language development, motor development, ASQ-3, developmental delay, primary care, reference values
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Development, Cognition, Humans, Language Development, Motor Skills, Pediatrics, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review