Verbal fluency performance in amnestic MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints
Open accessAbstract
Verbal fluency tests are employed regularly during neuropsychological assessments of older adults, and deficits are a common finding in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Little extant research, however, has investigated verbal fluency ability and subtypes in preclinical stages of neurodegenerative disease. We examined verbal fluency performance in 107 older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=37), cognitive complaints (CC, n=37) despite intact neuropsychological functioning, and demographically matched healthy controls (HC, n=33). Participants completed fluency tasks with letter, semantic category, and semantic switching constraints. Both phonemic and semantic fluency were statistically (but not clinically) reduced in amnestic MCI relative to cognitively intact older adults, indicating subtle changes in the quality of the semantic store and retrieval slowing. Investigation of the underlying constructs of verbal fluency yielded two factors: Switching (including switching and shifting tasks) and Production (including letter, category, and action naming tasks), and both factors discriminated MCI from HC albeit to different degrees. Correlational findings further suggested that all fluency tasks involved executive control to some degree, while those with an added executive component (i.e., switching and shifting) were less dependent on semantic knowledge. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of including multiple verbal fluency tests in assessment batteries targeting preclinical dementia populations and suggest that individual fluency tasks may tap specific cognitive processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Language and semantic memory are usually spared in the initial stages of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, though milder deficits such as anomia or reduced semantic verbal fluency can be identified.
“They are also usually spared in the initial stages of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), though we can still observe milder deficits, e.g., anomia or reduced semantic verbal fluency, which can be identified in a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation (Henry et al., 2004; Garrard et al., 2005; Nutter-Upham et al., 2008; Taler and Phillips, 2008).”
From Graph analysis of verbal fluency test discriminate between patients with Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and normal elderly controls (2014) · cites this paper as Nutter-Upham et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 238
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). The California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition: Adult version manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
- Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-Third Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott
- Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., Hannay, H. J., & Fischer, J. S. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Authors
- NUTTERUPHAM, K., SAYKIN, A., RABIN, L., ROTH, R., WISHART, H., PARE, N., & FLASHMAN, L.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- SAYKIN, A
- ORCID
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-241
- ISSN
- 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2743541
- OpenAlex
- W2013358874
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Alzheimer's Association
- National Academy of Neuropsychology
- National Institute on Aging (R01 AG19771, AG19771, R01AG019771)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- verbal fluency, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, cognitive complaints, older adults, preclinical dementia, phonemic fluency, semantic fluency, executive function, Alzheimer's disease, neuropsychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amnesia, Cognition Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Language Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Statistics as Topic, Verbal Behavior, Geriatric Assessment, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review