Cited by 87Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Role of imaging in the era of precision medicine

Giardino, Angela, Gupta, Supriya, Olson, Emmi, Sepulveda, Karla, Lenchik, Leon, Ivanidze, Jana, Rakow-Penner, Rebecca, Patel, Midhir J. +2 more·2017·Academic Radiology

Abstract

Precision medicine is an emerging approach for treating medical disorders, which takes into account individual variability in genetic and environmental factors. Preventive or therapeutic interventions can then be directed to those who will benefit most from targeted interventions, thereby maximizing benefits and minimizing costs and complications. Precision medicine is gaining increasing recognition by clinicians, healthcare systems, pharmaceutical companies, patients, and the government. Imaging plays a critical role in precision medicine including screening, early diagnosis, guiding treatment, evaluating response to therapy, and assessing likelihood of disease recurrence. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Precision Imaging Task Force convened to explore the current and future role of imaging in the era of precision medicine and summarized its finding in this article. We review the increasingly important role of imaging in various oncological and non-oncological disorders. We also highlight the challenges for radiology in the era of precision medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 144 · Cited by 87

Authors
Giardino, A., Gupta, S., Olson, E., Sepulveda, K., Lenchik, L., Ivanidze, J., Rakow-Penner, R., Patel, M. J., Subramaniam, R. M., & Ganeshan, D.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Gupta, Supriya
Venue
Academic Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
639-649
ISSN
1076-6332 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2581295769
Cited by
87
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
precision medicine, diagnostic imaging, early diagnosis, cancer screening, treatment response assessment, recurrence, personalized medicine
MeSH terms
Humans, Medical Oncology, Radiology, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review