Assessment of Musculoskeletal Discomfort and Evaluation of Radiology Workstation Ergonomics in a National Radiology Workforce
Abstract
Rationale and objectives We assessed the presence of musculoskeletal discomfort and evaluated the ergonomics parameters of radiology workstations and the impact of poor radiology workstation ergonomics on musculoskeletal discomfort in a national radiology workforce. Methods This was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study. All radiologist and radiology trainee members of the Canadian Association of Radiologists were eligible to participate. Radiology workstation ergonomics parameters and self-reported data on musculoskeletal discomfort were recorded. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to the data to ascertain the impact of participants' radiology workstation ergonomics parameters on the likelihood of experience of musculoskeletal discomfort while adjusting for demographic variables. Results A total of 191 questionnaires were completed. The median (interquartile range) age of participants was 42.0 years (17.0 years) and 56.8% of participants were female. One hundred fifty participants (78.5%) self-reported the presence of musculoskeletal discomfort. Ergonomics parameters most commonly implemented included having monitors an arm's length away (82.6%) and hands being shoulder-width apart (77.1%). Binary logistic regression revealed participants either not having the top of the monitor screen at eye level when in a seated position or not having the wrists straight and relatively flat when using the mouse was associated with an increased likelihood of experience of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Radiologists experience musculoskeletal discomfort affecting productivity when the top of the monitor is not at eye level in a seated position or when their wrists are not straight and flat while using the mouse.
“For example, a study showed that radiologists experience musculoskeletal discomfort affecting their productivity when the top of the monitor is not at eye level in a seated position or when their wrists are not straight and flat while using the mouse [309].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [309]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors
Yen, C., Epling, J. W., Rockwell, M., & Vaughn-Cooke, M. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16020347 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bentley, H., Wu, T., Russell, M., Fitzgerald, S., Chapman, N., Kolof, H., & Yong-Hing, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- BC Cancer Agency (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Bentley, Helena
- Venue
- Academic Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2101-2107
- ISSN
- 1076-6332 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313255446
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Occupational health in dentistry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Keywords
- musculoskeletal discomfort, radiologists, radiology residents, occupational health, labor productivity, wrist posture, mouse use, Canadian Association of Radiologists
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Adult, Animals, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Ergonomics, Male, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Radiology, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review