Cited by 14Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersOccupational health in dentistryRadiology practices and education

Assessment of Musculoskeletal Discomfort and Evaluation of Radiology Workstation Ergonomics in a National Radiology Workforce

Bentley, Helena, Wu, Tong, Russell, Mckenzie, Fitzgerald, Sabrina, Chapman, Nick, Kolof, Hanna, Yong-Hing, Charlotte J.·2023·Academic Radiology

Abstract

Rationale and objectives We assessed the presence of musculoskeletal discomfort and evaluated the ergonomics parameters of radiology workstations and the impact of poor radiology workstation ergonomics on musculoskeletal discomfort in a national radiology workforce. Methods This was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study. All radiologist and radiology trainee members of the Canadian Association of Radiologists were eligible to participate. Radiology workstation ergonomics parameters and self-reported data on musculoskeletal discomfort were recorded. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to the data to ascertain the impact of participants' radiology workstation ergonomics parameters on the likelihood of experience of musculoskeletal discomfort while adjusting for demographic variables. Results A total of 191 questionnaires were completed. The median (interquartile range) age of participants was 42.0 years (17.0 years) and 56.8% of participants were female. One hundred fifty participants (78.5%) self-reported the presence of musculoskeletal discomfort. Ergonomics parameters most commonly implemented included having monitors an arm's length away (82.6%) and hands being shoulder-width apart (77.1%). Binary logistic regression revealed participants either not having the top of the monitor screen at eye level when in a seated position or not having the wrists straight and relatively flat when using the mouse was associated with an increased likelihood of experience of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acra.2022.12.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiologists experience musculoskeletal discomfort affecting productivity when the top of the monitor is not at eye level in a seated position or when their wrists are not straight and flat while using the mouse.

    “For example, a study showed that radiologists experience musculoskeletal discomfort affecting their productivity when the top of the monitor is not at eye level in a seated position or when their wrists are not straight and flat while using the mouse [309].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bentley, H., Wu, T., Russell, M., Fitzgerald, S., Chapman, N., Kolof, H., & Yong-Hing, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
Corresponding author
Bentley, Helena
Venue
Academic Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
2101-2107
ISSN
1076-6332 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313255446
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Occupational health in dentistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
Keywords
musculoskeletal discomfort, radiologists, radiology residents, occupational health, labor productivity, wrist posture, mouse use, Canadian Association of Radiologists
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Animals, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Ergonomics, Male, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Radiology, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review