Spark plasma sintering and optical characterization of lunar regolith simulant
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Licheri, R., Orrù, R., Sani, E., Dell’Oro, A., & Cao, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- National Institute of Optics (IT)
- Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Sani, Elisa
- Venue
- Acta Astronautica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 201
- Pages
- 164-171
- ISSN
- 0094-5765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4295185265
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Acta Astronautica (publishedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
- Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (B96G18000560005)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
- Keywords
- lunar regolith simulant, JSC-1A, spark plasma sintering, in-situ resource utilization, solar energy harvesting, thermal energy storage, optical properties, solar absorptance, emissivity, relative density, surface porosity, glassy phase, sintering temperature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review