Development of a generalized parameter window for cold spray deposition
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spherical particles ranging in size from 10 to 50 μm are the most suitable range for spraying.
“The spherical particles range in size from 10 to 50 µm, which was shown to be the most suitable range for spraying by Schmidt et al. [28].”
From Cold Spray Process for Co-Deposition of Copper and Aluminum Particles (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Schmidt et al. measured the critical velocity of spherical pure aluminum particles as 400-420 m/s.
“Schmidt et al. [28] measured the critical velocity of spherical pure aluminum particles as 400-420 m/s.”
From Cold Spray Process for Co-Deposition of Copper and Aluminum Particles (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
After removing copper particles with axial velocities below the critical velocity in the simulation, the simulated copper mass percentages in the two regions were 54.261% and 32.592%, respectively.
“when we removed the copper particles with axial velocities below the critical velocity in the simulation [28,40], the mass percentages of copper particles in the two regions in the simulation were 54.261% and 32.592%, respectively.”
From Cold Spray Process for Co-Deposition of Copper and Aluminum Particles (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
The number of aluminum particles exceeding the critical velocity in the hybrid powder decreases by only 9.4%.
“Whereas, the number of aluminum particles exceeding the critical velocity [28] in the hybrid powder decreases by only 9.4%.”
From Cold Spray Process for Co-Deposition of Copper and Aluminum Particles (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adhesion strength of titanium particles to alumina substrates: A combined cold spray and LIPIT study
Imbriglio, S. I., Hassani-Gangaraj, M., Veysset, D., Aghasibeig, M., Gauvin, R., Nelson, K. A., Schuh, C. A., & Chromik, R. R. (2019) · Surface and Coatings Technology · doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.01.071 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Yang, X., Xu, H., Su, Y., Meng, T., Chai, X., Guo, Z., Ma, T., Yin, S., & Li, W. (2024) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.09.056 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Cold Spray Process for Co-Deposition of Copper and Aluminum Particles
Hu, S., Li, H., Zhang, L., & Xu, Y. (2023) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings13111953 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schmidt, T., Gärtner, F., Assadi, H., & Kreye, H.
- Affiliations
- Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schmidt, Tobias
- Venue
- Acta Materialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 729-742
- ISSN
- 1359-6454 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081313076
- Cited by
- 1,183
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 60 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 44.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Materialia (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
- Keywords
- cold spray, critical impact velocity, particle bonding, adiabatic shear instability, high strain rate deformation, coating quality, particle size effects, impact dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
