The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of interfacial microstructures in 3003 aluminum alloy blocks fabricated by ultrasonic additive manufacturing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The microstructural characterization of aluminum subjected to UAM deformation indicates a dislocation density between 10^9 and 10^11 cm^-2.
“The microstructural characterization of aluminum subjected to UAM deformation [50,51] indicates a dislocation density between 10 9 and 10 11 cm -2 .”
From Multi-layer solid-state ultrasonic additive manufacturing of aluminum/copper: local properties and texture (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Kong, 2005, Appl Opt, 44, 6325, 10.1364/AO.44.006325 · DOI
- Kong, 2004, Compos Struct, 66, 421, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.064 · DOI
- Li, 2008, Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process, 498, 421, 10.1016/j.msea.2008.08.037 · DOI
- Yang, 2007, J Eng Mater Technol – Trans ASME, 129, 538, 10.1115/1.2744431 · DOI
- Ram, 2007, Rapid Prototyping J, 13, 226, 10.1108/13552540710776179 · DOI
- Kong, 2004, J Mater Process Technol, 146, 181, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.016 · DOI
- Kulakov, 2009, J Eng Mater Technol – Trans ASME, 131, 021006, 10.1115/1.3078303 · DOI
- Ram, 2006, J Manuf Syst, 25, 221, 10.1016/S0278-6125(07)80011-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Li, 2009, J Mater Process Technol, 209, 1627, 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.018 · DOI
- Schick, 2010, Weld J, 89, 105s
- Johnson KE. Ph.D. Thesis, Loughborough University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties
DebRoy, T., Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Milewski, J. O., Beese, A. M., Wilson-Heid, A., De, A., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 · Cited by 8,805
Interdiffusion of Elements During Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing
Pagan, M., Petrie, C., Leonard, D., Sridharan, N., Zinkle, S., & Babu, S. S. (2021) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A · doi:10.1007/s11661-020-06131-2 · Cited by 23
Self-citationBehvar, A., Shakil, S. I., Pirgazi, H., Norfolk, M., & Haghshenas, M. (2024) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-024-13490-2 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Dehoff, R. R., & Babu, S. S.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Babu, S.S.
- Venue
- Acta Materialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4305-4315
- ISSN
- 1359-6454 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076766064
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Materialia (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Microstructure and mechanical properties
- Keywords
- ultrasonic additive manufacturing, 3003 aluminum alloy, interfacial microstructure, localized plastic deformation, recrystallization, grain growth, frictional sliding, sonotrode, solid-state processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
