The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes
Open accessAbstract
Understanding laser interaction with metal powder beds is critical in predicting optimum processing regimes in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals. In this work, we study the denudation of metal powders that is observed near the laser scan path as a function of laser parameters and ambient gas pressure. We show that the observed depletion of metal powder particles in the zone immediately surrounding the solidified track is due to a competition between outward metal vapor flux directed away from the laser spot and entrainment of powder particles in a shear flow of gas driven by a metal vapor jet at the melt track. Between atmospheric pressure and ∼10 Torr of Ar gas, the denuded zone width increases with decreasing ambient gas pressure and is dominated by entrainment from inward gas flow. The denuded zone then decreases from 10 to 2.2 Torr reaching a minimum before increasing again from 2.2 to 0.5 Torr where metal vapor flux and expansion from the melt pool dominates. The dynamics of the denudation process were captured using high-speed imaging, revealing that the particle movement is a complex interplay among melt pool geometry, metal vapor flow, and ambient gas pressure. The experimental results are rationalized through finite element simulations of the melt track formation and resulting vapor flow patterns. The results presented here represent new insights to denudation and melt track formation that can be important for the prediction and minimization of void defects and surface roughness in additively manufactured metal components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties
DebRoy, T., Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Milewski, J. O., Beese, A. M., Wilson-Heid, A., De, A., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 · Cited by 8,805
Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review
Grasso, M., & Colosimo, B. M. (2017) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/aa5c4f · Cited by 833
Zhao, C., Fezzaa, K., Cunningham, R. W., Wen, H., De Carlo, F., Chen, L., Rollett, A. D., & Sun, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03761-2 · Cited by 758
González-Henríquez, C. M., Sarabia-Vallejos, M. A., & Rodriguez-Hernandez, J. (2019) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.001 · Cited by 562
Fluid and particle dynamics in laser powder bed fusion
Bidare, P., Bitharas, I., Ward, R. M., Attallah, M. M., & Moore, A. J. (2018) · Acta Materialia · doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.051 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthews, M. J., Guss, G., Khairallah, S. A., Rubenchik, A. M., Depond, P. J., & King, W. E.
- Venue
- Acta Materialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 33-42
- ISSN
- 1359-6454 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2404524956
- Cited by
- 809
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.017
- The paper
- Matthews, M. J., Guss, G., Khairallah, S. A., Rubenchik, A. M., Depond, P. J., & King, W. E. (2016). Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes. Acta Materialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.