The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel
Open accessAbstract
Abstract With the development of the materials genome philosophy and data mining methodologies, machine learning (ML) has been widely applied for discovering new materials in various systems including high-end steels with improved performance. Although recently, some attempts have been made to incorporate physical features in the ML process, its effects have not been demonstrated and systematically analysed nor experimentally validated with prototype alloys. To address this issue, a physical metallurgy (PM) -guided ML model was developed, wherein intermediate parameters were generated based on original inputs and PM principles, e.g., equilibrium volume fraction (Vf) and driving force (Df) for precipitation, and these were added to the original dataset vectors as extra dimensions to participate in and guide the ML process. As a result, the ML process becomes more robust when dealing with small datasets by improving the data quality and enriching data information. Therefore, a new material design method is proposed combining PM-guided ML regression, ML classifier and a genetic algorithm (GA). The model was successfully applied to the design of advanced ultrahigh-strength stainless steels using only a small database extracted from the literature. The proposed prototype alloy with a leaner chemistry but better mechanical properties has been produced experimentally and an excellent agreement was obtained for the predicted optimal parameter settings and the final properties. In addition, the present work also clearly demonstrated that implementation of PM parameters can improve the design accuracy and efficiency by eliminating intermediate solutions not obeying PM principles in the ML process. Furthermore, various important factors influencing the generalizability of the ML model are discussed in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042519 · Cited by 12,280
Materials discovery and design using machine learning
Liu, Y., Zhao, T., Ju, W., & Shi, S. (2017) · Journal of Materiomics · doi:10.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.002 · Cited by 1,276
Ouyang, R., Curtarolo, S., Ahmetcik, E., Scheffler, M., & Ghiringhelli, L. M. (2018) · Physical Review Materials · doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.083802 · Cited by 944
Cited by
Wang, C., Zhang, Z., Jing, X., Yang, Z., & Xu, W. (2022) · Optics & Laser Technology · doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108442 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, C., Wang, C., Wei, X., Li, Y., van der Zwaag, S., & Xu, W.
- Venue
- Acta Materialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 179
- Pages
- 201-214
- ISSN
- 1359-6454 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969389191
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.033
- The paper
- Shen, C., Wang, C., Wei, X., Li, Y., van der Zwaag, S., & Xu, W. (2019). Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Materialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.