Enhancement of critical current density and critical magnetic field of superconducting medium entropy alloy Nb2/5Hf1/5Zr1/5Ti1/5
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Ta-Hf-Nb-Zr-Ti system has emerged as the most extensively investigated BCC-type HEA superconductor.
“The Ta-Hf-Nb-Zr-Ti system has emerged as the most extensively investigated BCC-type HEA superconductor 9 -17 .”
From Recent advances in high-entropy superconductors (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Hidayati, R., Kim, J. H., Jung, S.-G., Cho, K.-S., Yun, J. H., & Rhyee, J.-S.
- Affiliations
- Kyung Hee University (KR)
- Sunchon National University (KR)
- Kookmin University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Yun, Jae Hyun
- Rhyee, Jong-Soo
- Venue
- Acta Materialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 261
- Pages
- 119420
- ISSN
- 1359-6454 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4387448900
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Materialia (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2021R1A4A3029839, RS-2023-00247622)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Superconducting Materials and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › High Entropy Alloys Studies
- Keywords
- medium-entropy alloys, critical current density, upper critical field, flux pinning, vortex avalanches, specific heat jump, electron-phonon coupling, heavy fermion, BCS superconductivity, high-temperature superconductors, spark plasma sintering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
