Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A spatial scale assessment of habitat effects on arthropod communities of an oceanic island

Cardoso, Pedro, Aranda, Silvia C., Lobo, Jorge M., Dinis, Francisco, Gaspar, Clara, Borges, Paulo A.V.·2009·Acta Oecologica

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actao.2009.05.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Amorim, I.R., 2005. Colonization and diversification on oceanic islands: forest Tarphius and cave-dwelling Trechus beetles of the Azores, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California.
  2. Barlow, 2004, Resource abundance and invasiveness: a simple model, Biol. Invasions, 6, 261, 10.1023/B:BINV.0000034590.77961.6e · DOI
  3. Batáry, 2007, Responses of grassland specialist and generalist beetles to management and landscape complexity, Divers. Dist., 13, 196, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2006.00309.x · DOI
  4. Berndt, 2008, Relevance of exotic pine plantations as a surrogate habitat for ground beetles (Carabidae) where native forest is rare, Biodivers. Conserv., 17, 1171, 10.1007/s10531-008-9379-3 · DOI
  5. Bhagwat, 2008, Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity?, Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 261, 10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.005 · DOI
  6. Borges, 1991, Two new species of Tarphius Erichson, 1848 (Coleoptera, Colydiidae) from the Azores, Bocagiana, 143, 1
  7. Borges, 2004, Arthropod community structure in pastures of an island archipelago (Azores): looking for local-regional species richness patterns at small-scales, Bull. Entomol. Res., 94, 111, 10.1079/BER2004289 · DOI
  8. Borges, 2005, Ranking protected areas in the Azores using standardized sampling of soil epigean arthropods, Biodivers. Conserv., 14, 2029, 10.1007/s10531-004-4283-y · DOI
  9. Borges, 2006, Invasibility and species richness of island endemic arthropods: a general model of endemic vs. exotic species, J. Biogeo., 33, 169, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01324.x · DOI
  10. Borges, P.A.V., Ugland, K.I., Dinis, F.O., Gaspar, C. Insect and spider rarity in an oceanic island (Terceira, Azores): true rare and pseudo-rare species. In: Fattorini, S. (Ed.), Insect Ecology and Conservation, Research Signpost, in press.
  11. Boyce, 2006, Scale for resource selection functions, Divers. Dist., 12, 269, 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00243.x · DOI
  12. Brockerhoff, 2008, Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity?, Biodivers. Conserv., 17, 925, 10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cardoso, 2007, Biotic integrity of the arthropod communities in the natural forests of Azores, Biodivers. Conserv., 16, 2883, 10.1007/s10531-006-9078-x · DOI
  14. Cardoso, 2008, Assessing spider species richness and composition in Mediterranean cork oak forests, Acta Oecol., 33, 114, 10.1016/j.actao.2007.10.003 · DOI
  15. Cardoso, 2008, Rapid biodiversity assessment of spiders (Araneae) using semi-quantitative sampling: a case study in a Mediterranean forest, Insect Conserv. Divers., 1, 71, 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2007.00008.x · DOI
  16. Chao, 1984, Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population, Scand. J. Stat., 11, 265
  17. Chust, 2004, Scale dependency of insect assemblages in response to landscape pattern, Landscape Ecol., 19, 41, 10.1023/B:LAND.0000018368.99833.f2 · DOI
  18. Clough, 2005, Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales, J. Biogeo., 32, 2007, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01367.x · DOI
  19. Damschen, 2006, Corridors increase plant species richness at large scales, Science, 3131, 1284, 10.1126/science.1130098 · DOI
  20. Debinski, 2000, A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments, Conserv. Biol., 14, 342, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98081.x · DOI
  21. Didham, 1998, Beetle species responses to tropical forest fragmentation, Ecol. Monogr., 68, 295, 10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0295:BSRTTF]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  22. Didham, 2007, Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline, Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 489, 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Driscoll, 2005, Is the matrix a sea? Habitat specificity in naturally fragmented landscape, Ecol. Entomol., 30, 8, 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00666.x · DOI
  24. Driscoll, 2008, The frequency of metapopulations, metacommunities and nestedness in a fragmented landscape, Oikos, 117, 297, 10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16202.x · DOI
  25. Dungan, 2002, A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis, Ecography, 25, 626, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x · DOI
  26. Elias, R.B., Dias, E., 2009. Gap dynamics and regeneration strategies in Juniperus-Laurus forests of the Azores Islands. Plant. Ecol. 200, 179–189. · DOI
  27. Ewers, 2008, Pervasive impact of large-scale edge effects on a beetle community, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, 5426, 10.1073/pnas.0800460105 · DOI
  28. Fischer, 2007, Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis, Global Ecol. Biogeo., 16, 265, 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x · DOI
  29. Gaucherel, 2007, Multiscale and surface pattern analysis of the effect of landscape pattern on carabid beetles distribution, Ecol. Ind., 7, 598, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.07.002 · DOI
  30. González-Mejias, 2007, Diversity-habitat heterogeneity relationship at different spatial and temporal scales, Ecography, 30, 31
  31. Gotelli, 2001, Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness, Ecol. Lett., 4, 379, 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x · DOI
  32. He, 2005, The local–regional relationship: immigration, extinction and scale, Ecology, 86, 360, 10.1890/04-1449 · DOI
  33. Heleno, 2009, Effects of alien plants on insect abundance and biomass: a food-web approach, Conserv. Biol., 23, 410, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01129.x · DOI
  34. Hobbs, 2006, Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order, Global Ecol. Biogeo., 15, 1, 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x · DOI
  35. Hoekstra, 2005, Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection, Ecol. Lett., 8, 23, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00686.x · DOI
  36. Holland, 2004, Determining the spatial scale of species' response to habitat, BioScience, 54, 227, 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0227:DTSSOS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  37. Johnson, 2008, Relationships between resource selection, distribution, and abundance: a test with implications to theory and conservation, Pop Ecol., 50, 145, 10.1007/s10144-008-0078-4 · DOI
  38. Leibold, 2004, The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology, Ecol. Lett., 7, 601, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x · DOI
  39. Malanson, 1999, Landscape heterogeneity, connectivity, and critical landscapes for conservation, Divers. Dist., 5, 27, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00035.x · DOI
  40. Olden, 2006, Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography, J. Biogeo., 33, 2027, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01572.x · DOI
  41. Parker, 2002, Habitat loss and the habitat fragmentation threshold: an experimental evaluation of impacts on richness and total abundances using grassland invertebrates, Biol. Conserv., 105, 217, 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00184-7 · DOI
  42. Pawson, 2008, Non-native plantation forests as alternative habitat for native forest beetles in a heavily modified landscape, Biodivers. Conserv., 17, 1127, 10.1007/s10531-008-9363-y · DOI
  43. Pearman, 2002, The scale of community structure: habitat variation and avian guilds in tropical forest understory, Ecol. Monogr., 72, 19, 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0019:TSOCSH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  44. Perfecto, 2002, Quality of agroecological matrix in a tropical montane landscape: ants in coffee plantations in Southern Mexico, Conserv. Biol., 16, 174, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99536.x · DOI
  45. Pither, 2005, The evolutionary species pool hypothesis and patterns of freshwater diatom diversity along a pH gradient, J. Biogeo., 32, 503, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01194.x · DOI
  46. Pywell, 2007, Enhancing diversity of species-poor grasslands: an experimental assessment of multiple constraints, J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 81, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01260.x · DOI
  47. Rahbek, 2005, The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns, Ecol. Lett., 8, 224, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00701.x · DOI
  48. Resetarits, 2005, Habitat selection behaviour links local and regional scales in aquatic systems, Ecol. Lett., 8, 480, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00747.x · DOI
  49. Ricketts, 2001, The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes, Am. Nat., 158, 87, 10.1086/320863 · DOI
  50. Ricklefs, 1987, Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes, Science, 235, 167, 10.1126/science.235.4785.167 · DOI
  51. Ricklefs, 2008, Desintegration of the ecological community, Am. Nat., 172, 741, 10.1086/593002 · DOI
  52. Schmidt, 2008, Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales, J. Biogeo., 35, 157, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01774.x · DOI
  53. Silva, 2004, A characterization of the non-indigenous flora of the Azores archipelago, Biol. Inv., 6, 193, 10.1023/B:BINV.0000022138.75673.8c · DOI
  54. Steffan-Dewenter, 2002, Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds, Ecology, 83, 1421, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Thomas, 1999, The spatial structure of populations, J. Anim. Ecol., 68, 647, 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00330.x · DOI
  56. Turner, 2005, Scale-dependence in species-area relationships, Ecography, 28, 721, 10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04273.x · DOI
  57. Turquin, M.-J., 1973. Une biocenose cavernicole originale pour le Bugey: Le puits de Rappe. Commptes Rendus 96e Congresse Naturel Sociétès Savantes, Toulouse 1971, Sciences 3, pp. 235–256.
  58. Umetsu, 2008, Importance of estimating matrix quality for modeling species distribution in complex tropical landscapes: a test with Atlantic forest small mammals, Ecography, 31, 359, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05302.x · DOI
  59. Whittaker, 2001, Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species richness, J. Biogeo., 28, 453, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00563.x · DOI
  60. Whittingham, 2007, Will agri-environment schemes deliver substantial biodiversity gain, and if not why not?, J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 1, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01263.x · DOI
  61. Wiens, 1989, Spatial scaling in ecology, Funct. Ecol., 3, 385, 10.2307/2389612 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Woodcock, 2007, The potential of grass field margin management for enhancing beetle diversity in intensive livestock farms, J. Appl. Ecol., 44, 60, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01258.x · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cardoso, P., Aranda, S. C., Lobo, J. M., Dinis, F., Gaspar, C., & Borges, P. A. V.
Venue
Acta Oecologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
590-597
ISSN
1146-609X
Cited by
72
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.