Landscape heterogeneity as an ecological filter of species traits
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects of agricultural intensification at different spatial scales on functional community composition are unknown for almost all agroecosystems.
“Although species loss and biotic homogenization7 have been identified as major responses to agricultural intensification—clearly evidenced by the decline of specialist species, progressively replaced by more-generalist species34101112—the effects of agricultural intensification at different spatial scales on functional community composition are unknown for almost all agroecosystems, but see refs”
From Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization (2015) · cites this paper as [13]
Landscape scale simplification acts as an ecological filter, selecting against specialized butterfly species.
“Meanwhile, landscape scale simplification—both reduced diversity of land cover types (reduced compositional landscape heterogeneity) and an increase in patch sizes within the landscape (reduced configurational landscape heterogeneity)—has also been shown to act as an ecological filter, selecting against specialized butterfly species11(see refs 5, 13 for other variables).”
From Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization (2015) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 124
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hubert-Moy, L., Nabucet, J., Vannier, C., Lefebvre, A., 2012. Mapping ecological continuities: which data for which territorial level? Application to the forest and hedge network. International Journal of Geomatics and Spatial Analysis 22, 619-640.
- Authors
- Duflot, R., Georges, R., Ernoult, A., Aviron, S., & Burel, F.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Duflot, Rémi
- Venue
- Acta Oecologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 19-26
- ISSN
- 1146-609X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031238050
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Acta Oecologica (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Keywords
- landscape heterogeneity, environmental filtering, species traits, ground beetles, herbaceous plants, gamma diversity, functional diversity, landscape composition, landscape configuration, life-history traits, dispersal traits, phenology, trophic levels, woody habitat, grassland, agricultural landscapes, weed removal, seed dispersal, RLQ analysis, fourth-corner analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
