Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell infiltrative hydrogel fibrous scaffolds for accelerated wound healing

Open access
Zhao, Xin, Sun, Xiaoming, Yildirimer, Lara, Lang, Qi, Lin, Zhi Yuan (William), Zheng, Reila, Zhang, Yuguang, Cui, Wenguo, Annabi, Nasim, Khademhosseini, Ali·2017·Acta Biomaterialia

Abstract

Development of natural protein-based fibrous scaffolds with tunable physical properties and biocompatibility is highly desirable to construct a three-dimensional (3D), fully cellularized scaffold for wound healing. Herein, we demonstrated a simple and effective technique to construct electrospun 3D fibrous scaffolds for accelerated wound healing using a photocrosslinkable hydrogel based on methacryloylated gelatin (GelMA). We found that the physical properties of the photocrosslinkable hydrogel including water retention, stiffness, strength, elasticity and degradation can be tailored by changing the light exposure time. We further observed that the optimized hydrogel fibrous scaffolds which were soft and elastic could support cell adhesion, proliferation and migration into the whole scaffolds, facilitating regeneration and formation of cutaneous tissues within two weeks. Such tunable characteristics of the fibrous GelMA scaffolds distinguished them from other reported substrates developed for reconstruction of wound defects including glutaraldehyde-crosslinked gelatin or poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), whose physical and chemical properties were difficult to modify to allow cell infiltration into the 3D scaffolds for tissue regeneration. We anticipate that the ability to become fully cellularized will make the engineered GelMA hydrogel fibrous scaffolds suitable for widespread applications as skin substitutes or wound dressings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, X., Sun, X., Yildirimer, L., Lang, Q., Lin, Z. Y. (., Zheng, R., Zhang, Y., Cui, W., Annabi, N., & Khademhosseini, A.
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
49
Pages
66-77
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2547699807
Cited by
313
References
3
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell infiltrative hydrogel fibrous scaffolds for accelerated wound healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.017
The paper
Zhao, X., Sun, X., Yildirimer, L., Lang, Q., Lin, Z. Y. (., Zheng, R., Zhang, Y., Cui, W., Annabi, N., & Khademhosseini, A. (2017). Cell infiltrative hydrogel fibrous scaffolds for accelerated wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.