Perfusion-decellularization of human ear grafts enables ECM-based scaffolds for auricular vascularized composite tissue engineering
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Human ear reconstruction is recognized as the emblematic enterprise in tissue engineering. Up to now, it has failed to reach human applications requiring appropriate tissue complexity along with an accessible vascular tree. We hereby propose a new method to process human auricles in order to provide a poorly immunogenic, complex and vascularized ear graft scaffold. METHODS: 12 human ears with their vascular pedicles were procured. Perfusion-decellularization was applied using a SDS/polar solvent protocol. Cell and antigen removal was examined by histology and DNA was quantified. Preservation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) was assessed by conventional and 3D-histology, proteins and cytokines quantifications. Biocompatibility was assessed by implantation in rats for up to 60 days. Adipose-derived stem cells seeding was conducted on scaffold samples and with human aortic endothelial cells whole graft seeding in a perfusion-bioreactor. RESULTS: Histology confirmed cell and antigen clearance. DNA reduction was 97.3%. ECM structure and composition were preserved. Implanted scaffolds were tolerated in vivo, with acceptable inflammation, remodeling, and anti-donor antibody formation. Seeding experiments demonstrated cell engraftment and viability. CONCLUSIONS: Vascularized and complex auricular scaffolds can be obtained from human source to provide a platform for further functional auricular tissue engineered constructs, hence providing an ideal road to the vascularized composite tissue engineering approach. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The ear is emblematic in the biofabrication of tissues and organs. Current regenerative medicine strategies, with matrix from donor tissues or 3D-printed, didn't reach any application for reconstruction, because critically missing a vascular tree for perfusion and transplantation. We previously described the production of vascularized and cell-compatible scaffolds, from porcine ear grafts. In this study, we ---- applied findings directly to human auricles harvested from postmortem donors, providing a perfusable matrix that retains the ear's original complexity and hosts new viable cells after seeding. This approach unlocks the ability to achieve an auricular tissue engineering approach, associated with possible clinical translation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinicians prefer human tissue for applications to circumvent animal-borne diseases and potential residual contamination and immunogenicity of xenogeneic dECM from animals.
“To circumvent animal‐borne diseases and potential residual contamination and immunogenicity of xenogeneic dECM from animals, clinicians prefer human tissue for applications.”
From Bioactive scaffolds for tissue engineering: A review of decellularized extracellular matrix applications and innovations (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- Duisit, J., Amiel, H., Wüthrich, T., Taddeo, A., Dedriche, A., Destoop, V., Pardoen, T., Bouzin, C., Joris, V., Magee, D., Vögelin, E., Harriman, D., Dessy, C., Orlando, G., Behets, C., Rieben, R., Gianello, P., & Lengelé, B.
- Affiliations
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
- UCLouvain (BE)
- University of Bern (CH)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University Hospital of Bern (CH)
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
- Corresponding author
- Duisit, Jérôme
- ORCID
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 339-354
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797700396
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
- Funders
- Fondation Saint Luc
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
- Keywords
- perfusion decellularization, ear reconstruction, extracellular matrix scaffolds, adipose-derived stem cells, aortic endothelial cells, biocompatibility, perfusion bioreactor
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Blood Pressure, Cadaver, DNA, Ear, Extracellular Matrix, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Perfusion, Stem Cells, Stress, Mechanical, Swine, Tissue Transplantation, Adipocytes, Bioreactors, Tissue Engineering, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review