Cited by 201Gynecological conditions and treatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineMesenchymal stem cell research

A collagen scaffold loaded with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells facilitates endometrial regeneration and restores fertility

Xin, Liaobing, Lin, Xiaona, Pan, Yibin, Zheng, Xiaowen, Shi, Libing, Zhang, Yanling, Ma, Lie, Gao, Changyou +1 more·2019·Acta Biomaterialia

Abstract

In women of reproductive age, severe injuries to the endometrium are often accompanied by endometrial scar formation or intrauterine adhesions (IUAs), which can result in infertility or miscarriage. Although many approaches have been used to treat severe IUAs, high recurrence rates and endometrial thinning have limited therapeutic efficiency. In this study, a collagen scaffold (CS) loaded with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) was fabricated and applied for endometrial regeneration. The CS/UC-MSCs promoted human endometrial stromal cell proliferation and inhibited apoptosis in vitro through paracrine effects. In a model of endometrial damage, transplantation with the CS/UC-MSCs maintained normal luminal structure, promoted endometrial regeneration and collagen remodeling, induced intrinsic endometrial cell proliferation and epithelium recovery, and enhanced the expression of estrogen receptor α and progesterone receptor. An improved ability of the regenerated endometrium to receive embryos was confirmed. Together, our results indicate that the CS/UC-MSCs promoted endometrial structural reconstruction and functional recovery. Topical administration of the CS/UC-MSCs after trans-cervical resection of adhesions might prevent re-adhesion, promote endometrium regeneration and improve pregnancy outcomes for patients with severe IUAs. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Intrauterine adhesions due to severe endometrium injuries happen frequently in clinic and becom…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At 60 days post-transplantation, endometrial thickness in the CS/UC-MSC group reached 610 ± 30 μm, markedly greater than that in the CS (220 ± 20 μm) and NR (170 ± 20 μm) groups (p < 0.01).

    “At 60 days post-transplantation, the endometrial thickness in the CS/UC-MSC group reached 610 ± 30 µm, markedly greater than that in the CS (220 ± 20 µm) and NR (170 ± 20 µm) groups (p < 0.01).”
  • Collagen deposition was significantly reduced to 41 ± 2% in the CS/UC-MSC group, comparable to the sham group (41 ± 3%) and far lower than in the CS (74 ± 2%) and NR (75 ± 2%) groups (p < 0.01).

    “Collagen deposition was also significantly reduced to 41 ± 2%, comparable to the sham group (41 ± 3%) and far lower than in the CS (74 ± 2%) and NR (75 ± 2%) groups (p < 0.01).”
  • The CS/UC-MSCs system supports structural regeneration of the endometrium and restores its functional competence, offering a potent strategy for treating IUA and promoting fertility restoration.

    “These findings demonstrate that the CS/UC-MSCs system not only supports the structural regeneration of the endometrium, but also restores its functional competence, offering a potent strategy for treating IUA and promoting fertility restoration (Figure 1(C1–C12, D1–D7)) [35].”
  • In a rat model of severe intrauterine adhesion, application of a collagen scaffold loaded with human umbilical-cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells significantly promoted endometrial regeneration and reduced adhesion recurrence.

    “In a rat model of severe intrauterine adhesion (IUA), the application of a collagen scaffold (CS) loaded with human umbilical-cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) significantly promoted endometrial regeneration and reduced adhesion recurrence [35].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xin, L., Lin, X., Pan, Y., Zheng, X., Shi, L., Zhang, Y., Ma, L., Gao, C., & Zhang, S.
Affiliations
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ma, Lie
  • Zhang, Songying
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
92
Pages
160-171
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944793886
Cited by
201
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
22.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research Program of China (2018YFC1004800, 2017YFA0104900)
  • Wu Jieping medical fund (320.6755.15028)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51673167)
  • Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province (2017C03022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
Keywords
collagen scaffolds, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, endometrial regeneration, intrauterine adhesions, infertility, fertility restoration, paracrine effects, endometrial stromal cells, estrogen receptor alpha, progesterone receptor, collagen remodeling
MeSH terms
Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Becaplermin, Animals, Cattle, Collagen, Endometrium, Epithelium, Female, Fertility, Humans, Keratins, Receptors, Progesterone, Regeneration, Umbilical Cord, Uterus, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Ki-67 Antigen, Paracrine Communication, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Cell Proliferation, Transforming Growth Factor beta1, Tissue Scaffolds, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review