The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative in vitro study on binary Mg-RE (Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu) alloy systems
Abstract
Correct selection of alloying elements is important for developing novel biodegradable magnesium alloys with superior mechanical and biological performances. In contrast to various reports on nutrient elements (Ca, Zn, Sr, etc.) as alloying elements of biomedical magnesium alloys, there is limited information about how to choose the right rare earth elements (REEs) as alloying elements of magnesium. In this work, 16 kinds of REEs were individually added into Mg, including Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Du, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu, to fabricate binary Mg-RE model alloys with different composition points. Under the same working history, comparative studies were undertaken and the impact of each kind of rare earth element on the microstructure, mechanical property, corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of Mg were investigated. The corresponding influence level for the 16 kinds of REEs were ranked. The results showed that the second phases were detected in some Mg-RE alloys, which were mainly composed of Mg12RE. By adding different REEs into Mg with proper contents, the mechanical properties of resulting Mg-RE binary alloys could be adjusted in wide range. The corrosion resistance of Mg-light REE alloys was generally better than Mg-heavy REE alloys. As for biocompatibility, Mg-RE model alloys showed no cytotoxic effect on MC3T3-E1 cells. The hemolysis rates of all experimental Mg-RE model alloys were lower than 5% except for Mg-Lu alloy model. In general, the addition of different REEs into Mg could improve its performance from different aspects. This work provides a better understanding on suitable REEs as alloying elements for magnesium, and the future R&D direction on biomedical Mg-RE alloys was proposed. Statement of Significance In contrast to various reports on nutrient elements (Ca, Zn, Sr, etc.) as alloying elements of biomedical magnesium alloys, until now there is limited information about how to choose the right rare earth elements (REEs) as alloying elements of magnesium. In this work, comparative studies were undertaken by individually adding 16 kinds of REEs, including Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Du, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu, into Mg to fabricate binary Mg-RE model alloys, with different composition points, then the impact of each kind of rare earth element on the microstructure, mechanical property, corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of Mg under the same working history were investigated, and the corresponding influence level for the 16 kinds of REEs were ranked. This work provides a better understanding on suitable REEs as alloying elements for magnesium, and the future R&D direction on biomedical Mg-RE alloys was proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zheng, Y. F., Gu, X. N., & Witte, F. (2014) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.01.001 · Cited by 2,436
Self-citationUnderstanding Magnesium Corrosion—A Framework for Improved Alloy Performance
Song, G., & Atrens, A. (2003) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.200310405 · Cited by 2,056
In vitro corrosion and biocompatibility of binary magnesium alloys
Gu, X., Zheng, Y., Cheng, Y., Zhong, S., & Xi, T. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.021 · Cited by 1,343
Self-citationResearch on an Mg–Zn alloy as a degradable biomaterial
Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Zhao, C., Li, J., Song, Y., Xie, C., Tao, H., Zhang, Y., He, Y., Jiang, Y., et al. (2010) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.028 · Cited by 1,336
Self-citationRecent advances on the development of magnesium alloys for biodegradable implants
Chen, Y., Xu, Z., Smith, C., & Sankar, J. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.005 · Cited by 1,236
Zhang, Y., Xu, J., Ruan, Y. C., Yu, M. K., O'Laughlin, M., Wise, H., Chen, D., Tian, L., Shi, D., Wang, J., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4162 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationMeasurement of the corrosion rate of magnesium alloys using Tafel extrapolation
Shi, Z., Liu, M., & Atrens, A. (2010) · Corrosion Science · doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.016 · Cited by 1,029
Nature's building blocks : an A-Z guide to the elements
Emsley, J. (2001) · Cited by 958
Novel Magnesium Alloys Developed for Biomedical Application: A Review
Li, N., & Zheng, Y. (2013) · Journal of Materials Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2013.02.005 · Cited by 744
Self-citationIn vitro studies of biomedical magnesium alloys in a simulated physiological environment: A review
Xin, Y., Hu, T., & Chu, P. K. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.004 · Cited by 729
Cited by
Zhao, C., Wen, M., Wang, Q., Ouyang, W., Xu, D., Jia, Z., Zheng, Y., Xi, T., & Sheng, L. (2025) · Journal of Materials Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2025.01.016 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Bian, D., Zheng, Y., Chu, X., Lin, Y., Wang, M., Lin, Z., Li, M., Zhang, Y., & Guan, S.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 508-528
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2987821910
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative in vitro study on binary Mg-RE (Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu) alloy systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.013
- The paper
- Liu, J., Bian, D., Zheng, Y., Chu, X., Lin, Y., Wang, M., Lin, Z., Li, M., Zhang, Y., & Guan, S. (2020). Comparative in vitro study on binary Mg-RE (Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu) alloy systems. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.