Endotoxin, not DNA, determines the host response and tissue regeneration behavior of acellular biologic scaffolds
Abstract
Established quantitative standards for assessing decellularization of biologic scaffolds based on residual DNA levels have been well-documented and widely acknowledged. However, post-implantation complications, such as fever and seroma, are commonly observed which negatively impact clinical outcomes. The presence of cellular debris following decellularization or using source tissues that are naturally high in endotoxin may contribute to the host response to a biologic scaffold. In the study, several multi-step decellularization methods were used to decellularize small intestinal submucosa (SIS) to obtain materials with three distinct levels of residual DNA, lipid residues, and endogenous endotoxin. The potential influence of these residual components on macrophage and lymphocyte polarization in vitro, as well as on the host inflammatory response in vivo post intra-abdominal implantation or abdominal wall defect repair in rats, was assessed. Urinary bladder matrix (UBM) meeting established decellularization criteria and naturally devoid of endotoxin was utilized as a control. The presence of endogenous endotoxin in SIS-ECM resulted in notable changes in macrophage phenotype. SIS-ECM samples with endotoxin levels below FDA limits still upregulated pro-inflammatory factors in vitro. Conversely, SIS with minimal endotoxin content and UBM controls prompted a shift towards a pro-remodeling M2 phenotype, fostering constructive tissue remodeling in a rodent model of abdominal wall defects, irrespective of DNA content. These findings suggest that endotoxin may be a crucial factor influencing biologic scaffolds that are not fully accounted by current decellularization standards. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Clinically utilized decellularized biologic scaffolds that meet the established quantitative standards still suffer problems in high incidence of inflammatory complications, including fever and seroma. In this study, we confirmed that endotoxin, rather than residual DNA, is the crucial factor influencing host responses and regenerative outcomes. Tissue sources and decellularization processes are critical for reducing endotoxin levels and attenuating immuno-inflammatory complications. These findings enhance the evaluation of ECM scaffold performance for clinical application, thereby facilitating improved preparation and utilization for tissue defect repairs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Xenogeneic DNA present in porcine biologic scaffolds is not linked to an inflammatory immune response, but to other factors such as endotoxins.
“In fact, recent studies have shown that xenogeneic DNA present in porcine biologic scaffolds is not linked to an inflammatory immune response [130], but to other factors such as endotoxins [131].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [131]
Cites
Kasravi, M., Ahmadi, A., Babajani, A., Mazloomnejad, R., Hatamnejad, M. R., Shariatzadeh, S., Bahrami, S., & Niknejad, H. (2023) · Biomaterials Research · doi:10.1186/s40824-023-00348-z · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Regulation of decellularized matrix mediated immune response
Chakraborty, J., Roy, S., & Ghosh, S. (2020) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c9bm01780a · Cited by 130 · see citing works
The effect of cell debris within biologic scaffolds upon the macrophage response
Londono, R., Dziki, J. L., Haljasmaa, E., Turner, N. J., Leifer, C. A., & Badylak, S. F. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36055 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review
Romero, D. J., Hussey, G., & Capella-Monsonís, H. (2025) · Biologics · doi:10.3390/biologics5030028 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The resulting inflammatory environment can inhibit scaffold remodeling, promote fibrotic encapsulation, or even contribute to graft rejection [131].”
- Authors
- Cheng, W., Huang, Y., Dai, J., Zhao, M., Wang, Y., Turner, N., & Zhang, J.
- Affiliations
- Second Military Medical University (CN)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Turner, Neill
- Zhang, Jian
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 195
- Pages
- 157-168
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4407186058
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- endotoxin, decellularization, small intestinal submucosa, urinary bladder matrix, residual DNA, macrophage polarization, M2 phenotype, host inflammatory response, seroma, fever, abdominal wall defect repair, tissue regeneration, extracellular matrix
- MeSH terms
- Decellularized Extracellular Matrix, Animals, DNA, Endotoxins, Intestinal Mucosa, Macrophages, Male, Regeneration, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review