Spanish–English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading
Abstract
Using a self-paced moving window reading paradigm, we examine the degree to which structural commitments made while 60 Spanish-English L2 speakers read syntactically ambiguous sentences in their second language (L2) are constrained by the verb's lexical entry about its preferred structural environment (i.e., subcategorization bias). The ambiguity under investigation arises because a noun phrase immediately following a verb can be parsed as either the direct object of the verb 'The CIA director confirmed the rumor when he testified before Congress', or as the subject of an embedded complement 'The CIA director confirmed the rumor could mean a security leak'. In an experiment with 59 monolingual English participants, we replicate the findings reported in the previous literature demonstrating that native speakers are guided by subcategorization bias information during sentence interpretation. In a bilingual experiment, we then show that L2 subcategorization biases influence L2 sentence interpretation. The results indicate that L2 speakers keep track of the relative frequencies of verb-subcategorization alternatives and use this information when building structure in the L2.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transfer of syntactic awareness skills from English L3 to both Arabic L1 and Hebrew L2 occurred.
“Overall, the findings prove in the clearest way possible that a transfer of syntactic awareness skills from English L3 to both Arabic L1 and Hebrew L2 did occur, which is identical to the findings of others”
From Cognitive Retroactive Transfer (CRT) of Language Skills among Trilingual Arabic-Hebrew and English Learners (2014) · cites this paper as Dussias & Scaltz, 2008
Cites
Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C. (1994) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969408402115 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abu-Rabia, S., & Shakkour, W. (2014) · Open Journal of Modern Linguistics · doi:10.4236/ojml.2014.41001 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“…findings prove in the clearest way possible that a transfer of syntactic awareness skills from English L3 to both Arabic L1 and Hebrew L2 did occur, which is identical to the findings of others (Abu-Rabia & Sanitsky, 2010; Abu-Rabia & Siegel, 2003; Dussias & Scaltz, 2008; Droop & Verhoeven, 1998).”
ResultRossi, E., Diaz, M., Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00342 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dussias, Paola E.
- ORCID
- Dussias, Paola E.
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 501-513
- ISSN
- 0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136525752
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 50629, R03HD050629)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- syntactic ambiguity resolution, second language reading, Spanish-English bilinguals, structural commitment, complementation, sentence parsing, self-paced reading
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Humans, Psycholinguistics, Reading, Spain, Speech Perception, Time Factors, United States, Bias, Multilingualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review