Cited by 237Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental materials and restorations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The American Dental Association Caries Classification System for Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background The caries lesion, the most commonly observed sign of dental caries disease, is the cumulative result of an imbalance in the dynamic demineralization and remineralization process that causes a net mineral loss over time. A classification system to categorize the location, site of origin, extent, and when possible, activity level of caries lesions consistently over time is necessary to determine which clinical treatments and therapeutic interventions are appropriate to control and treat these lesions. Methods In 2008, the American Dental Association (ADA) convened a group of experts to develop an easy-to-implement caries classification system. The ADA Council on Scientific Affairs subsequently compiled information from these discussions to create the ADA Caries Classification System (CCS) presented in this article. Conclusions The ADA CCS offers clinicians the capability to capture the spectrum of caries disease presentations ranging from clinically unaffected (sound) tooth structure to noncavitated initial lesions to extensively cavitated advanced lesions. The ADA CCS supports a broad range of clinical management options necessary to treat both noncavitated and cavitated caries lesions. Practical implications The ADA CCS is available for implementation in clinical practice to evaluate its usability, reliability, and validity. Feedback from clinical practitioners and researchers will allow system improvement. Use of the ADA CCS will offer standardized data that can be used to improve the scientific rationale for the treatment of all stages of caries disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adaj.2014.11.018

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Beltrán-Aguilar, 2005, Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002, MMWR Surveill Summ, 54, 1
  2. Dye, 2007, Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004, Vital Health Stat, 11, 1
  3. Young, 2013, Caries management by risk assessment, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 41, e53, 10.1111/cdoe.12031 · DOI
  4. Featherstone, 2004, The caries balance: the basis for caries management by risk assessment, Oral Health Prev Dent, 2, 259
  5. Featherstone, 2006, Caries prevention and reversal based on the caries balance, Pediatr Dent, 28, 128
  6. Tellez, 2013, Evidence on existing caries risk assessment systems: are they predictive of future caries?, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 41, 67, 10.1111/cdoe.12003 · DOI
  7. Fontana, 2006, Assessing patients’ caries risk, JADA, 137, 1231
  8. Twetman, 2009, Patient caries risk assessment, Monogr Oral Sci, 21, 91, 10.1159/000224214 · DOI
  9. Ismail, 2013, Caries management pathways preserve dental tissues and promote oral health, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 41, e12, 10.1111/cdoe.12024 · DOI
  10. Jenson, 2007, Clinical protocols for caries management by risk assessment, J Calif Dent Assoc, 35, 714
  11. Tellez, 2013, Non-surgical management methods of noncavitated caries lesions, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 41, 79, 10.1111/cdoe.12028 · DOI
  12. Klein, 1938, Studies on dental caries. I. Dental status and dental needs of elementary school children, Public Health Reports, 53, 751, 10.2307/4582532 · DOI
  13. Gruebbel, 1944, A measurement of dental caries prevalence and treatment service for deciduous teeth, J Dent Res, 23, 163, 10.1177/00220345440230030201 · DOI
  14. Ismail, 2007, The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 35, 170, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Pitts, 2004, “ICDAS”: an international system for caries detection and assessment being developed to facilitate caries epidemiology, research and appropriate clinical management, Community Dent Health, 21, 193
  16. Frencken, 2011, The Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) index: rationale and development, Int Dent J, 61, 117, 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00022.x · DOI
  17. Garvin, 2008, Caries classification system under study, ADA News, 39, 1
  18. Fisher, 2012, A new model for caries classification and management: the FDI World Dental Federation caries matrix, JADA, 143, 546
  19. Longbottom, 2009, Glossary of key terms, Monogr Oral Sci, 21, 209, 10.1159/000224225 · DOI
  20. William, 2006, Molar incisor hypomineralization: review and recommendations for clinical management, Pediatr Dent, 28, 224
  21. Pitts, 1992, An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth, Caries Res, 26, 146, 10.1159/000261500 · DOI
  22. Lunder, 1996, Approximal cavitation related to bite-wing image and caries activity in adolescents, Caries Res, 30, 143, 10.1159/000262151 · DOI
  23. Hintze, 1998, Reliability of visual examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated caries lesions in contacting approximal surfaces, Caries Res, 32, 204, 10.1159/000016454 · DOI
  24. Ekstrand, 2009, Lesion activity assessment, Monogr Oral Sci, 21, 63, 10.1159/000224213 · DOI
  25. Kidd, 1996, Criteria for caries removal at the enamel-dentine junction: a clinical and microbiological study, Br Dent J, 180, 287, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809066 · DOI
  26. Twetman, 2013, Risk assessment: can we achieve consensus?, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 41, e64, 10.1111/cdoe.12026 · DOI
  27. Domejean, 2011, Validation of the CDA CAMBRA caries risk assessment: a six-year retrospective study, J Calif Dent Assoc, 39, 709
  28. Stookey, 2005, Should a dental explorer be used to probe suspected carious lesions? No—use of an explorer can lead to misdiagnosis and disrupt remineralization, JADA, 136, 1527
  29. Anusavice, 2005, Present and future approaches for the control of caries, J Dent Educ, 69, 538
  30. Altarakemah, 2013, A new approach to reliability assessment of dental caries examinations, Community Dent Epidemiol, 41, 309

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–211 of 211

Metadata

Authors
Young, D. A., Nový, B. B., Zeller, G. G., Hale, R., Hart, T. C., Truelove, E. L., Ekstrand, K. R., Featherstone, J. D. B., Fontana, M., Ismail, A., Kuehne, J., Longbottom, C., Pitts, N., Sarrett, D. C., Wright, T., Mark, A. M., & Beltran-Aguilar, E.
Affiliations
  • University of the Pacific (US)
  • Loma Linda University (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • United States Army (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Truelove, Edmond L.
Venue
The Journal of the American Dental Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
146
Issue
2
Pages
79-86
ISSN
0002-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006219947
Cited by
237
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2015-06-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Dental Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental materials and restorations
Keywords
dental caries, cavitated caries lesions, demineralization and remineralization, caries treatment, clinical standardization
MeSH terms
Dental Caries, Humans, Societies, Dental, Tooth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review