Gender and prescription opioids: Findings from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health
Open accessAbstract
Background Significant gender differences in drug and alcohol use have been reported; however, little is known about gender differences in prescription opioid misuse and dependence. This study compared correlates, sources and predictors of prescription opioid non-medical use, as well as abuse or dependence among men and women in a nationally-representative sample.Methods Participants were 55,279 (26,746 men, 28,533 women) non-institutionalized civilians aged 12years and older who participated in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.Results Rates of lifetime and past-year non-medical use of prescription opiates were 13.6% and 5.1%, respectively. Significantly more men than women endorsed lifetime (15.9% vs. 11.2%) and past-year use (5.9% vs. 4.2%; ps<0.0001). Among past-year users, 13.2% met criteria for current prescription opiate abuse or dependence, and this did not differ significantly by gender. Polysubstance use and treatment underutilization were common among both men and women, however significantly fewer women than men had received alcohol or drug abuse treatment (p=0.001). Men were more likely than women to obtain prescription opioids for free from family or friends, and were more likely to purchase them from a dealer (ps<.01). Gender-specific predictors of use as compared to abuse/dependence were also observed.Conclusions The findings highlight important differences between men and women using prescription opiates. The observed differences may help enhance the design of gender-sensitive surveillance, identification, prevention and treatment interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some methods suggest that complete debiasing might be undesirable in domains such as social science and medicine.
“and some methods suggest that complete debiasing might be undesirable in domains such as social science and medicine (McFadden et al. 1992;Back et al. 2010).”
From Towards trustworthy LLMs: a review on debiasing and dehallucinating in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as Back et al. 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 240
- Authors
- Back, S. E., Payne, R. L., Simpson, A. N., & Brady, K. T.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Back, Sudie E.
- Venue
- Addictive Behaviors
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1001-1007
- ISSN
- 0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2919630
- OpenAlex
- W1963948425
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA021228, R25DA020537)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029882)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Keywords
- prescription opioids, gender differences, nonmedical opioid use, opioid misuse, opioid use disorder, polydrug use, treatment utilization, gender-sensitive interventions, National Survey on Drug Use and Health
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Opioid-Related Disorders, Drug Prescriptions, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Illicit Drugs, United States, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review