Cited by 26Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Characteristics of clinically anxious versus non-anxious regular, heavy marijuana users

Van Dam, Nicholas T., Bedi, Gillinder, Earleywine, Mitch·2012·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Both the key mechanism of action for marijuana (the endocannabinoid system) and the symptoms associated with marijuana withdrawal suggest an important link to anxiety. Despite this link, there is a dearth of research on the characteristics of heavy marijuana users with clinical-level anxiety compared to those with heavy marijuana use alone. Over 10,000 participants (friends or affiliates of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws) provided data via online survey. After careful, conservative screening, anxiety, other psychopathology, other drug use, and marijuana-related problems were examined in 2567 heavy marijuana users. Subsequently, 275 heavy users with clinical-level anxiety were compared to demographically-equivalent non-anxious heavy users on psychopathology, drug use, and cannabis-related problems. Among several psychological variables (including anxiety, depression, schizotypy, and impulsivity), anxiety was most strongly predictive of amount of marijuana used and marijuana-related problems. Group comparison (n=550 total) revealed that clinically anxious heavy users exhibited more use, more non-anxiety psychopathological symptoms, and a greater number and severity of marijuana-related problems than their non-anxious peers. The findings reveal that anxiety shows an important relation to marijuana use and related problems among regular, heavy users. Further examinations of common and unique factors predisposing individuals for anxiety and marijuana abuse appear warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.05.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Targeting components of the ECB system could represent a novel therapeutic approach to developing effective anxiolytic medications devoid of the unwanted effects of cannabis.

    “It also led to the notion that targeting components of the ECB system could represent a novel therapeutic approach to developing effective anxiolytic medications devoid of the unwanted effects of cannabis (e.g., cognitive impairment, abuse liability) [4,12] (Box 1).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 26

Authors
Van Dam, N. T., Bedi, G., & Earleywine, M.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
37
Issue
11
Pages
1217-1223
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035656219
Cited by
26
References
53
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
cannabis use, clinical anxiety, heavy cannabis users, cannabis-related problems, endocannabinoid system, depression, schizotypy, impulsivity, psychopathology, cannabis use disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Smoking, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review