Characteristics of clinically anxious versus non-anxious regular, heavy marijuana users
Abstract
Both the key mechanism of action for marijuana (the endocannabinoid system) and the symptoms associated with marijuana withdrawal suggest an important link to anxiety. Despite this link, there is a dearth of research on the characteristics of heavy marijuana users with clinical-level anxiety compared to those with heavy marijuana use alone. Over 10,000 participants (friends or affiliates of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws) provided data via online survey. After careful, conservative screening, anxiety, other psychopathology, other drug use, and marijuana-related problems were examined in 2567 heavy marijuana users. Subsequently, 275 heavy users with clinical-level anxiety were compared to demographically-equivalent non-anxious heavy users on psychopathology, drug use, and cannabis-related problems. Among several psychological variables (including anxiety, depression, schizotypy, and impulsivity), anxiety was most strongly predictive of amount of marijuana used and marijuana-related problems. Group comparison (n=550 total) revealed that clinically anxious heavy users exhibited more use, more non-anxiety psychopathological symptoms, and a greater number and severity of marijuana-related problems than their non-anxious peers. The findings reveal that anxiety shows an important relation to marijuana use and related problems among regular, heavy users. Further examinations of common and unique factors predisposing individuals for anxiety and marijuana abuse appear warranted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Targeting components of the ECB system could represent a novel therapeutic approach to developing effective anxiolytic medications devoid of the unwanted effects of cannabis.
“It also led to the notion that targeting components of the ECB system could represent a novel therapeutic approach to developing effective anxiolytic medications devoid of the unwanted effects of cannabis (e.g., cognitive impairment, abuse liability) [4,12] (Box 1).”
From Amygdala FAAH and anandamide: mediating protection and recovery from stress (2013) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Van Dam, N. T., Bedi, G., & Earleywine, M.
- Affiliations
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Addictive Behaviors
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1217-1223
- ISSN
- 0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035656219
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- cannabis use, clinical anxiety, heavy cannabis users, cannabis-related problems, endocannabinoid system, depression, schizotypy, impulsivity, psychopathology, cannabis use disorder
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Smoking, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review