Cited by 29Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Prevalence of withdrawal symptoms from electronic cigarette cessation: a cross-sectional analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health

Hughes, John R., Callas, Peter W.·2019·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Electronic cigarette use can produce rapid and high levels of nicotine and thus could produce or maintain a physical dependence on nicotine. No experimental and limited observational studies have tested whether cessation of e-cigarettes is associated with withdrawal symptoms. To examine withdrawal from electronic cigarettes and compare it to that from tobacco cigarettes, we searched the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Survey to locate successful and unsuccessful attempts to stop electronic or tobacco cigarettes. We examined electronic cigarette-only users, tobacco cigarette-only users and dual users. A minority of e-cigarette users who stopped/reduced e-cigarettes reported withdrawal symptoms but reported fewer symptoms than tobacco cigarette users who stopped/reduced tobacco cigarettes. E-cigarette withdrawal was not significantly greater in those who tried but were unable to stop e-cigarettes. In dual users, continued tobacco use appeared to reduce e-cigarette withdrawal but the opposite was not true. Given our small sample size and use of retrospective recall, an experimental test of e-cigarette abstinence is needed to better describe the severity of electronic cigarette withdrawal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on e-cigarette withdrawal is limited, but recent analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Survey and a clinical trial indicated that withdrawal symptoms were mild in never smokers.

    “There is limited research on withdrawal from e-cigarettes, but recent analysis of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Survey and a clinical trial by the same investgators indicated that withdrawal symptoms were mild in never smokers (Hughes & Callas, 2019; Hughes et al., 2020)”

    From Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain. (2020) · cites this paper as Hughes & Callas, 2019

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 29

Authors
Hughes, J. R., & Callas, P. W.
Affiliations
University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Hughes, John R.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
91
Pages
234-237
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2879284370
Cited by
29
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (1 R01 CA-192940)
  • National Institutes of Health (CA-192940)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
electronic cigarettes, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, e-cigarette cessation, nicotine dependence, dual use of tobacco and e-cigarettes, smoking cessation, Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study
MeSH terms
Vaping, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotine, Severity of Illness Index, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation, Nicotinic Agonists, Young Adult, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review