The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymer recycling in an open-source additive manufacturing context: Mechanical issues
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Nowadays, the low recycling rate of polymers is still a challenge to humankind due to energy, economic and logistical issues. In the context of additive manufacturing, there is an exponential use of thermoplastic materials in the industrial and public open-source additive manufacturing sector, leading to an increase in global polymer consumption and waste generation. However, the coupling of the open-source 3D printers with polymer processing could potentially offer the basis for a new paradigm of distributed recycling process. It could be a complementary alternative to the traditional paradigm of centralized recycling of polymers, which is often uneconomical and energy intensive due to transportation embodied energy. In order to achieve this goal, a first step is to prove the technical feasibility to recycle thermoplastic material intended for open-source 3D printing feedstock. The contribution of the present study is twofold: first, a general methodology to evaluate the recyclability of thermoplastics used as feedstock in open-source 3D printing machines is proposed. Then, the proposed methodology is applied to the recycling study of polylactic acid (PLA) material addressed to the fused filament fabrication (FFF) technique, which is currently the most widely used. The main results of this application contribute to the understanding of the influence of the material's physico-chemical degradation on its mechanical properties as well as its potential distributed recyclability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plastics Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities
Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., & Kosior, E. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0311 · Cited by 3,201
Poly(lactic acid) fiber: An overview
Gupta, B., Revagade, N., & Hilborn, J. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.01.005 · Cited by 1,360
Biodegradable Polymers-A Review on Recent Trends and Emerging Perspectives
Luckachan, G. E., & Pillai, C. K. S. (2011) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-011-0317-1 · Cited by 767
Effect of thermo-mechanical cycles on the physico-chemical properties of poly(lactic acid)
Pillin, I., Montrelay, N., Bourmaud, A., & Grohens, Y. (2008) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.12.005 · Cited by 289
Biodegradable Poly(Lactic Acid): Synthesis, Modification, Processing and Applications
Ren, J. (2010) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17596-1 · Cited by 190
Cited by
3D printing filament as a second life of waste plastics—a review
Mikula, K., Skrzypczak, D., Izydorczyk, G., Warchoł, J., Moustakas, K., Chojnacka, K., & Witek-Krowiak, A. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10657-8 · Cited by 382
Spoerk, M., Holzer, C., & Gonzalez‐Gutierrez, J. (2020) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.48545 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Cruz Sanchez, F. A., Boudaoud, H., Hoppe, S., & Camargo, M.
- Venue
- Additive Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 87-105
- ISSN
- 2214-7810 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-8604
- OpenAlex
- W2744769922
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymer recycling in an open-source additive manufacturing context: Mechanical issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013
- The paper
- Cruz Sanchez, F. A., Boudaoud, H., Hoppe, S., & Camargo, M. (2017). Polymer recycling in an open-source additive manufacturing context: Mechanical issues. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.