Mechanoresponsive materials for drug delivery: Harnessing forces for controlled release
Open accessAbstract
Mechanically-activated delivery systems harness existing physiological and/or externally-applied forces to provide spatiotemporal control over the release of active agents. Current strategies to deliver therapeutic proteins and drugs use three types of mechanical stimuli: compression, tension, and shear. Based on the intended application, each stimulus requires specific material selection, in terms of substrate composition and size (e.g., macrostructured materials and nanomaterials), for optimal in vitro and in vivo performance. For example, compressive systems typically utilize hydrogels or elastomeric substrates that respond to and withstand cyclic compressive loading, whereas, tension-responsive systems use composites to compartmentalize payloads. Finally, shear-activated systems are based on nanoassemblies or microaggregates that respond to physiological or externally-applied shear stresses. In order to provide a comprehensive assessment of current research on mechanoresponsive drug delivery, the mechanical stimuli intrinsically present in the human body are first discussed, along with the mechanical forces typically applied during medical device interventions, followed by in-depth descriptions of compression, tension, and shear-mediated drug delivery devices. We conclude by summarizing the progress of current research aimed at integrating mechanoresponsive elements within these devices, identifying additional clinical opportunities for mechanically-activated systems, and discussing future prospects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Shear stress-sensitive liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles can release anti-inflammatory or antifibrotic agents specifically at sites with elevated hemodynamic shear stress, enabling localized drug release triggered by mechanical forces.
“For example, shear stresssensitive liposomes and polymeric nanoparticles can release antiinflammatory or antifibrotic agents specifically at sites with elevated hemodynamic shear stress, enabling localized drug release triggered by mechanical forces (153, 154).”
From The mechanotransduction-immune axis in organ fibrosis: dual regulatory mechanisms and translational therapeutic perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [153]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 158 · Cited by 126
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [126]Volodkin D Skirtach A Möhwald H Bioactive Surfaces 2011 Heidelberg Springer, Berlin
- [153]Xiao L Zhu J Londono DJ Pochan DJ Jia X Mechano-Responsive Hydrogels Crosslinked by Block Copolymer Micelles Soft Matter 2012 8 10233 10237 23024698 PMC3459338
- Authors
- Wang, J., Kaplan, J. A., Colson, Y. L., & Grinstaff, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grinstaff, Mark W.
- Venue
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 68-82
- ISSN
- 0169-409X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5285479
- OpenAlex
- W2550312623
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 158
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Wallace H. Coulter Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (T32EB006359)
- National Science Foundation (DMR-1507081, DGE-1247312)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
- Keywords
- mechanoresponsive materials, controlled release, hydrogels, elastomeric substrates, nanomaterials, spatiotemporal drug release
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Stress, Mechanical, Drug Delivery Systems, Hydrogels, Nanostructures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review