Biomembrane-based nanostructures for cancer targeting and therapy: From synthetic liposomes to natural biomembranes and membrane-vesicles
Abstract
The translational success of liposomes in chemotherapeutics has already demonstrated the great potential of biomembrane-based nanostructure in effective drug delivery. Meanwhile, increasing efforts are being dedicated to the application of naturally derived lipid membranes, including cellular membranes and extracellular vesicles in anti-cancer therapies. While synthetic liposomes support superior multifunctional flexibility, natural biomembrane materials possess interesting biomimetic properties and can also be further engineered for intelligent design. Despite being remarkably different from each other in production and composition, the phospholipid bilayer structure in common allows liposomes, cell membrane-derived nanomaterials, and extracellular vesicles to be modified, functionalized, and exploited in many similar manners against challenges posed by tumor-targeted drug delivery. This review will summarize the recent advancements in engineering the membrane-derived nanostructures with "intelligent" modules to respond, regulate, and target tumor cells and the microenvironment to fight against malignancy. We will also discuss perspectives of combining engineered functionalities with naturally occurring activity for enhanced cancer therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to synthetic delivery systems, exosomes administered in vivo result in fewer immunogenic reactions, toxicity, and adverse effects due to their biocompatible nature.
“Compared to synthetic delivery systems, exosomes administered in vivo result in fewer immunogenic reactions, toxicity, and adverse effects due to their biocompatible nature. This makes exosomes a safer and more efficient option for mRNA delivery [81].”
From Exosome for mRNA delivery: Strategies and therapeutic applications (2024) · cites this paper as [81]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 311 · Cited by 153
- Authors
- Wang, J., Zhu, M., & Nie, G.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Motao
- Nie, Guangjun
- Venue
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 178
- Pages
- 113974
- ISSN
- 0169-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3199574355
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 311
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDBS-LY-SLH039, XDB36000000)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFE0205300, 2018YFA0208900)
- K. C. Wong Education Foundation (GJTD-2018-03)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Keywords
- liposomes, extracellular vesicles, tumor targeting, anticancer drug delivery, phospholipid bilayers, biomimetic nanoparticles, stimuli-responsive nanostructures, tumor microenvironment, cancer therapy
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Biological Products, Humans, Immunotherapy, Liposomes, Neoplasms, Drug Delivery Systems, Biomimetic Materials, Nanostructures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review