Advances, challenges, and future directions in the clinical translation of ECM biomaterials for regenerative medicine applications
Abstract
Extracellular Matrix (ECM) scaffolds and biomaterials have been widely used for decades across a variety of diverse clinical applications and have been implanted in millions of patients worldwide. ECM-based biomaterials have been especially successful in soft tissue repair applications but their utility in other clinical applications such as for regeneration of bone or neural tissue is less well understood. The beneficial healing outcome with the use of ECM biomaterials is the result of their biocompatibility, their biophysical properties and their ability to modify cell behavior after injury. As a consequence of successful clinical outcomes, there has been motivation for the development of next-generation formulations of ECM materials ranging from hydrogels, bioinks, powders, to whole organ or tissue scaffolds. The continued development of novel ECM formulations as well as active research interest in these materials ensures a wealth of possibilities for future clinical translation and innovation in regenerative medicine. The clinical translation of next generation formulations ECM scaffolds faces predictable challenges such as manufacturing, manageable regulatory pathways, surgical implantation, and the cost required to address these challenges. The current status of ECM-based biomaterials, including clinical translation, novel formulations and therapies currently under development, and the challenges that limit clinical translation of ECM biomaterials are reviewed herein.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most healthcare regulatory bodies, such as the FDA and EMA, still neglect the immunological effects of ECM bioscaffolds and consider them as medical devices or tissue-engineered products.
“However, most healthcare regulatory bodies, such as the FDA and EMA, still neglect their immunological effects and still consider ECM bioscaffolds as medical devices (FDA) or tissue-engineered products (EMA) [191,211]”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [191]
Uncrosslinked ECM scaffolds are a risky option in scenarios where a challenging mechanical load is required, such as tendon augmentation or ventral hernia repair, leading to bulging or mechanical failure.
“As a result, uncrosslinked ECM scaffolds are a risky option in scenarios where a challenging mechanical load is required, such as tendon augmentation [68,[204][205][206] or ventral hernia repair [207,208], leading to bulging or mechanical failure [191].”
From Immune Response to Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: A Comprehensive Review (2025) · cites this paper as [191]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 225 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Capella-Monsonís, H., Crum, R. J., Hussey, G. S., & Badylak, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-08
- Volume
- 211
- Pages
- 115347
- ISSN
- 0169-409X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399357933
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 225
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Keywords
- extracellular matrix biomaterials, clinical translation, regenerative medicine, soft tissue repair, bone regeneration, neural tissue regeneration, hydrogels, bioinks, tissue engineering scaffolds, biocompatibility, biophysical properties, scaffold fabrication, regulatory pathways, surgical implantation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine, Tissue Scaffolds, Translational Research, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review