Cited by 737Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Youth engaging in online harassment: associations with caregiver–child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics☆

Ybarra, Michele L, Mitchell, Kimberly J·2004·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

To date, research focused on "traditional" (i.e. in-person) youth bullying behaviour has documented serious psychosocial challenges for those involved. How this literature translates to youth engaging in aggressive behaviours online has yet to be examined. Using the largest US sample of youth Internet users to date, psychosocial characteristics of youth engaging in Internet harassment were examined. Results from the nationally representative survey suggested that Internet harassment is a significant public health issue, with aggressors facing multiple psychosocial challenges including poor parent-child relationships, substance use, and delinquency. Comparisons to traditional bullies were made, with similarities and differences noted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internet use is positively related to cyberbullying experiences such that the more teenagers are online, the more interaction with cyberbullying incidences.

    “Internet use has also been found to be positively related to cyberbullying experiences such that the more teenagers are online, the most interaction with cyberbullying incidences (Kwan and Skoric, 2013;Ybarra, 2004;Ybarra and Mitchell, 2004).”

    From A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy (2015) · cites this paper as Ybarra and Mitchell, 2004

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 737

Authors
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
Corresponding author
Ybarra, Michele L
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-25
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
319-336
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W2069165059
Cited by
737
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 58
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
  • National Institute of Mental Health (#280‐99‐8023)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
online harassment, cyberbullying, youth aggression, parent-child relationship, internet use, substance use, juvenile delinquency, psychosocial outcomes, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Social Behavior, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Caregivers, Substance-Related Disorders, Internet, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review