The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized controlled trials evaluating adolescent dating violence prevention programs with an outcome of reduced perpetration and/or victimization: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction Adolescent dating violence (ADV), including psychological, physical, threatening, and/or sexual abuse between adolescent romantic partners, is an epidemic in the United States, with youth report rates ranging from 15 to 77% for perpetration and 14-73% for victimization. ADV victimization is associated with multiple adverse outcomes in both adolescence and adulthood (e.g., suicidal ideation, substance use, bullying), as is ADV perpetration (e.g., sexually transmitted infections, intimate partner violence in adulthood). Given the high prevalence and profound impact of ADV on youth in the US, many prevention efforts have emerged in the past 20 years. Previous reviews of these efforts have focused primarily on school-based interventions or have broadly reviewed programs including all research design types and outcomes. This review is the first to provide a comprehensive, quantitative synthesis of all existing ADV prevention programs tested using randomized controlled trial designs with a control group, specifically measuring ADV perpetration and/or victimization as outcomes. Methods Employing a systematic literature search and screening protocol, nine studies were identified for meta-analysis. Results Results indicate that ADV prevention programs may decrease the risk of emotional, physical, and sexual perpetration, as well as emotional and physical victimization. Conclusions This is the first review to uncover significant intervention effects on the actual occurrenc…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Meta-analyses have found adolescent dating violence prevention pro grams can reduce sexual violence, increase knowledge, and foster prosocial attitudes (Lee & Wong, 2022; Russell, Voith, & Lee, 2021).”
From Child sexual abuse by different classes and types of perpetrator: Prevalence and trends from an Australian national survey (2024) · cites this paper as Russell, Voith, & Lee, 2021
Citations
Cites
Dating violence prevention with at-risk youth: a controlled outcome evaluation
Wolfe, D. A., Wekerle, C., Scott, K., Straatman, A.-L., Grasley, C., & Reitzel-Jaffe, D. (2003) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.71.2.279 · Cited by 405
Miller, E., Tancredi, D. J., McCauley, H. L., Decker, M. R., Virata, M. C. D., Anderson, H. A., Stetkevich, N., Brown, E. W., Moideen, F., & Silverman, J. G. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.018 · Cited by 349
Fellmeth, G. L., Heffernan, C., Nurse, J., Habibula, S., & Sethi, D. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004534.pub3 · Cited by 154
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1177/1077801208322058 · DOI
- 10.1177/0886260506291657 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2017-2790 · DOI
- 10.3102/0034654316632061 · DOI
- Dedert E., 2013, Computerized cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with depressive or anxiety disorders
- 10.1177/2158244014535787 · DOI
- Espelage D.L., 2014, Bullying, sexual, and dating violence trajectories from early to late adolescence (NIJ Document No. 246830)
- Evidence Prime, 2015, GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro guideline development tool [computer software]
- 10.1007/s11121-005-0007-0 · DOI
- 10.1177/1059840515598843 · DOI
- Higgins J.P.T., 2011, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (V. 5.1.0; Chapter 8)
- Higgins J.P.T., 2011, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions
- 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00149.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10802-013-9717-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11121-011-0240-7 · DOI
- 10.1037/vio0000049 · DOI
- Maiuro R.D., 2015, Perspectives on verbal and psychological abuse
- 10.1177/1524838014537903 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.019 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301902 · DOI
- 10.1086/675851 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.286.5.572 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.93.7.1104 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11121-012-0293-2 · DOI
- The Nordic Cochrane Center, 2014, Review manager (RevMan) version 5.3 [computer software]
- 10.1080/15388220903130197 · DOI
- 10.1080/10926771.2014.920452 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3577 · DOI · Paper page
- Weir C.J., 2018, Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes: A systematic review, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1
- 10.1093/swr/25.2.89 · DOI
- 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.69 · DOI
Cited by
Mathews, B., Finkelhor, D., Pacella, R., Scott, J. G., Higgins, D. J., Meinck, F., Erskine, H. E., Thomas, H. J., Lawrence, D., Malacova, E., et al. (2024) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106562 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, K. N., Voith, L. A., & Lee, H.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Russell, Katie N.
- Venue
- Journal of Adolescence
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-01-09
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-14
- ISSN
- 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9254
- OpenAlex
- W3120065471
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- adolescent dating violence, perpetration, victimization, romantic relationships, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse, intimate partner violence, prevention program effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Humans, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Crime Victims, Bullying
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized controlled trials evaluating adolescent dating violence prevention programs with an outcome of reduced perpetration and/or victimization: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.12.009
- The paper
- Russell, K. N., Voith, L. A., & Lee, H. (2021). Randomized controlled trials evaluating adolescent dating violence prevention programs with an outcome of reduced perpetration and/or victimization: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.12.009
