Cited by 53Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Student-teacher conflict moderates the link between students’ social status in the classroom and involvement in bullying behaviors and exposure to peer victimization.

Marengo, Davide, Fabris, Matteo Angelo, Prino, Laura Elvira, Settanni, Michele, Longobardi, Claudio·2021·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Student-teacher relationships have been shown to influence bullying-related behaviors in students. In this study we considered the moderating role of student-teacher conflict and students' social status in the classroom and involvement in bullying behaviors and peer victimization. METHODS: Sample consisted of 1742 students (47.2% females, mean age = 10.79; SD = 1.36; range = 8-14) clustered in 113 classrooms, of which 1017 (58.4%) attended primary schools and 725 (41.6%) attended lower secondary schools. We implemented a series of multilevel analyses aimed at determining the role of student-teacher conflict, and students' social status among classroom peers (i.e., average, popular, rejected, neglected, and controversial statuses), as well their interaction, in influencing verbal, physical, and social forms of bullying and victimization at school. RESULTS: Student-teacher conflict had a significant positive effect on all bullying and victimization variables. Regarding students' social status, rejected students showed increased bullying and victimization when compared with average students, except in social bullying. Significant interactions emerged indicating that a highly conflictual student-teacher relationship exacerbated bullying behaviors and the risk of victimization among rejected students. Additionally, popular students who had conflictual relationship with their teachers were more likely to engage in physical bullying then average students. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the importance of low conflictual student-teacher relationships in acting as a buffer for aggressive student-student interactions in the classroom, especially when these interactions involve students rejected by their classroom peers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 53

Authors
Marengo, D., Fabris, M. A., Prino, L. E., Settanni, M., & Longobardi, C.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Settanni, Michele
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
86-97
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W3129146216
Cited by
53
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
teacher-student conflict, teacher-student relationship, peer rejection, peer victimization, bullying, verbal bullying, physical bullying, social bullying, school bullying, primary and lower secondary school students
MeSH terms
School Teachers, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Schools, Psychological Distance, Students, Crime Victims, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review