Cited by 28Impact of Technology on AdolescentsIdentity, Memory, and TherapyPersonality Traits and Psychology

To compare, or not to compare? Age moderates the relationship between social comparisons on instagram and identity processes during adolescence and emerging adulthood

Noon, Edward John, Schuck, Leon Aljosha, Guțu, Smaranda Maria, Şahin, Burak, Vujović, Bojana, Aydın, Zeynep·2021·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

Introduction: Social networking sites such as Instagram have provided young people with unprecedented opportunities for social comparison, and such behaviour can have implications for identity development. Although initial evidence suggests that there may be developmental differences in terms of how such behaviour informs identity development during adolescence and emerging adulthood, all previous research has been conducted in highly individualistic cultural contexts (i.e., the UK and the US). Method: To shed further light on these possible developmental differences and to determine whether results replicate amongst young people from more collectivist cultural contexts, cross‐sectional survey data were collected from 1,085 ( M age = 18.87, SD = 2.57; Female = 77.8%) adolescents and emerging adults in Romania and Serbia between December 2019 and March 2020. The relationships between social comparisons of ability and opinion on Instagram and three key identity processes (i.e., commitment, in‐depth exploration, and reconsideration of commitment) were then examined. Result: Hierarchical multiple regression analyses identified significant age differences in terms of how social comparisons of ability and opinion on Instagram associated with identity commitment and in‐depth exploration. Furthermore, possible cultural differences were identified in terms of how social comparisons of opinion on Instagram associated with the identity processes. Conclusion: Overall, results suggest that whilst social comparisons on Instagram can elicit self‐focus and prompt further exploration, developmental and cultural factors may influence how such behaviour informs identity development during adolescence and emerging adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.10.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 88 · Cited by 28

Authors
Noon, E. J., Schuck, L. A., Guțu, S. M., Şahin, B., Vujović, B., & Aydın, Z.
Affiliations
  • Leeds Trinity University (GB)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • University of Bucharest (RO)
  • Istanbul University (TR)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Noon, Edward John
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
134-145
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W3212889921
Cited by
28
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Faculty of Philosophy (University of Belgrade) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
social comparison, Instagram, identity construction, identity commitment, age differences, collectivist culture, cultural differences, adolescents, emerging adults, social networking sites, self-focus
MeSH terms
Social Comparison, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review