The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting compressive strength of lightweight foamed concrete using extreme learning machine model
Open accessAbstract
The utilization of extreme learning machine model.Predicting compressive strength of foamed concrete.Multiple concrete components were investigated.ELM showed a realistic and trustful model for the applied application. In this research, a machine learning model namely extreme learning machine (ELM) is proposed to predict the compressive strength of foamed concrete. The potential of the ELM model is validated in comparison with multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), M5 Tree models and support vector regression (SVR). The Lightweight foamed concrete is produced via creating a cellular structure in a cementitious matrix during the mixing process, and is widely used in heat insulation, sound attenuation, roofing, tunneling and geotechnical applications. Achieving product consistency and accurate predictability of its performance is key to the success of this technology. In the present study, an experimental database encompassing pertinent data retrieved from several previous studies has been created and utilized to train and validate the ELM, MARS, M5 Tree and SVR machine learning models. The input parameters for the predictive models include the cement content, oven dry density, water-to-binder ratio and foamed volume. The predictive accuracy of the four models has been assessed via several statistical score indicators. The results showed that the proposed ELM model achieved an adequate level of prediction accuracy, improving MARS, M5 Tree and SVR models. Hence, the ELM model could be employed as a reliable and accurate data intelligent approach for predicting the compressive strength of foamed concrete, saving laborious trial batches required to attain the desired product quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R. (2014) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 · Cited by 7,178
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Cited by
Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review
Thai, H.-T. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 748
Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning
Batra, R., Song, L., & Ramprasad, R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y · Cited by 446
Zhang, J., Ma, G., Huang, Y., sun, J., Aslani, F., & Nener, B. (2019) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.189 · Cited by 389
Shariati, M., Mafipour, M. S., Ghahremani, B., Azarhomayun, F., Ahmadi, M., Trung, N. T., & Shariati, A. (2022) · Engineering with Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-020-01081-0 · Cited by 367
Duan, J., Asteris, P. G., Nguyen, H., Bui, X.-N., & Moayedi, H. (2021) · Engineering with Computers · doi:10.1007/s00366-020-01003-0 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Yaseen, Z. M., Deo, R. C., Hilal, A., Abd, A. M., Bueno, L. C., Salcedo-Sanz, S., & Nehdi, M. L.
- Venue
- Advances in Engineering Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 115
- Pages
- 112-125
- ISSN
- 0965-9978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2758887415
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting compressive strength of lightweight foamed concrete using extreme learning machine model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.09.004
- The paper
- Yaseen, Z. M., Deo, R. C., Hilal, A., Abd, A. M., Bueno, L. C., Salcedo-Sanz, S., & Nehdi, M. L. (2018). Predicting compressive strength of lightweight foamed concrete using extreme learning machine model. Advances in Engineering Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.09.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.