Barriers, facilitators, and factors influencing the perceived feasibility of family-based physical activity: The role of socioeconomic status
Open accessAbstract
The facilitators and barriers to family-based physical activity, child and parent perceptions of the factors influencing their perceived feasibility of family-based physical activity, and the impact of socioeconomic status on these, are relatively unexplored. This study aimed to determine the barriers and facilitators to, and factors influencing the perceived feasibility of, family-based physical activity, with consideration of the impact of socioeconomic status. Focus groups and separate parent and child interviews were conducted with 24 families ( n = 79; 37 parents, 42 children) in the East Midlands, UK, who were categorised into low (deciles 1–3; 5 families), middle (deciles 4–7; 8 families), or high (deciles 8–10; 11 families) socioeconomic status using the UK index of multiple deprivation score, 2019. Regardless of socioeconomic status, parental role modelling was a key facilitator, whilst high cost and lack of free time were barriers for all families. In addition, low socioeconomic status families discussed child role modelling as a facilitator, and the access to and provision of local facilities as a barrier to physical activity, whilst this was a facilitator for middle-high socioeconomic status families. Regardless of socioeconomic status, when discussing factors influencing the perceived feasibility of family-based physical activity, differing levels of fitness between children and parents was a factor mentioned across generations. All parents thought family-based p…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organized sports, music lessons and arts programs often involve participation fees, equipment costs and logistical coordination, which can constitute structural barriers for lower-income families.
“Organized sports, music lessons and arts programs often involve participation fees, equipment costs and logistical coordination, which can constitute structural barriers for lower-income families (Chin & Phillips, 2004;Fountain et al., 2025).”
From Participation in extracurricular activities predicts academic growth and mediates socioeconomic inequalities in primary school (2026) · cites this paper as Fountain et al., 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brunet, L., Rémeau, M., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.70127
- Authors
- Fountain, S. M., Cooper, S. B., Williams, R. A., Sunderland, C., Bowes, A., & Dring, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Nottingham Trent University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fountain, Scarlett M.
- Venue
- Advanced Exercise and Health Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 205-214
- ISSN
- 2950-273X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413015144
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Advanced Exercise and Health Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- socioeconomic status, barriers and facilitators, perceived feasibility, parental role modeling, leisure, family time, child safety, team sports, children aged 8-12
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review