The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of the hybrid artificial intelligence and optimization modelling of hydrological streamflow forecasting
Open accessAbstract
Ever since the first introduction of Artificial Intelligence into the field of hydrology, it has further generated immense interest in researching aspects for further improvements to hydrology. This can be seen in the rising number of related works published. This culminated further with the combination of pioneering optimization techniques. Who would have thought that the birds and the bees can offer advances in the mathematical sciences and so have the ants too? The ingenuity of humans is spelled out in the algorithms that mimic many natural activities, like pack hunting by the wolves! This review paper serves to broadcast more of the intriguing interest in newfound procedures in optimal forecasting. Reservoirs are the main and most efficient water storage facilities for managing uneven water distribution. However, due to the major global climate changes which affect rainfall trend and weather, it has been a necessity to find an alternative solution for effective conventional water balance. A multifunctional reservoir operation appears to require the operator to make wise decisions to achieve an optimal reservoir operation. One of the most important aspects of all this is the forecasting of streamflows. For this, Artificial Intelligence (AI) seems to be the best alternative solution; as in the past three decades, there has been a drastic increase in building and developing AI models for forecasting and modelling unstable patterns in various hydrological fields. Nevertheless, AI models are also required to be optimized in tandem to achieve the best result, leading thus to the desirous forming of hybrid models between a standalone AI model and optimization techniques. This comprehensive study categorizes machine learning into three main categories, together with the optimization techniques, and will next explore the various AI model used for different hydrology fields along with the most common optimization techniques. Summarization of findings under every section is provided. Some advantages and disadvantages found through literature reviews are summarized for ease of reference. Finally, future recommendations and overall conclusions drawn from the results of researchers are included. This current review focuses on papers from high-impact factor publications based on 10 years starting from (2009 to 2020).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/icnn.1995.488968 · Cited by 58,192
Particle swarm optimization: An overview
Poli, R., Kennedy, J., & Blackwell, T. (2007) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0 · Cited by 21,101
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 · Cited by 19,343
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system
Jang, J.-S. R. (1993) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.256541 · Cited by 16,254
Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks
Ganin, Y., Ustinova, E., Ajakan, H., Germain, P., Larochelle, H., Laviolette, F., Marchand, M., & Lempitsky, V. (2017) · Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58347-1_10 · Cited by 8,318
Forecasting with artificial neural networks:
Zhang, G., Eddy Patuwo, B., & Y. Hu, M. (1998) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(97)00044-7 · Cited by 4,229
Fuzzy Model Identification Based on Cluster Estimation
Chiu, S. L. (1994) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/ifs-1994-2306 · Cited by 2,782
Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks
Waibel, A., Hanazawa, T., Hinton, G., Shikano, K., & Lang, K. J. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.21701 · Cited by 2,643
A Comparative Analysis of Selection Schemes Used in Genetic Algorithms
Goldberg, D. E., & Deb, K. (1991) · Foundations of Genetic Algorithms · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-050684-5.50008-2 · Cited by 2,407
Metadata
- Authors
- Ibrahim, K. S. M. H., Huang, Y. F., Ahmed, A. N., Koo, C. H., & El-Shafie, A.
- Venue
- Alexandria Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 279-303
- ISSN
- 1110-0168 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3166587882
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 13.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the hybrid artificial intelligence and optimization modelling of hydrological streamflow forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.100
- The paper
- Ibrahim, K. S. M. H., Huang, Y. F., Ahmed, A. N., Koo, C. H., & El-Shafie, A. (2022). A review of the hybrid artificial intelligence and optimization modelling of hydrological streamflow forecasting. Alexandria Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.