A ‘time and motion’ evaluation of automated dispensing machines in the emergency department
Abstract
Background There has been limited assessment of the impact that automated medication dispensing machines have on the medication administration process, particularly in Australian emergency departments. The aim of this study is to examine the change in medication retrieval times, number of medications retrieved and staff perceptions before and after the installation of automated dispensing machines in an Australian emergency and trauma centre. Methods A time and motion method recorded the time taken and number of medications retrieved from the medication room by emergency department staff, before and after the installation of two automated dispensing machines. Surveys were administered to staff members to elicit the perceived impact on clinical practice, utilising 5-point Likert scales. Results A total of 954 medication retrievals (1030 medications) were recorded in the pre-implementation period and 842 (991 medications) in the post-implementation period. The mean time taken to retrieve any medication was significantly longer in the post-implementation period (+5.7s; p<0.01). For schedules 2, 3, 4 or unscheduled medications, the mean time increased by 26.9s (p<0.01), but decreased by 36.1s (p<0.01) for schedule 8 or 11 medications. The mean number of medications per retrieval increased slightly in the post implementation period (+0.10; p<0.01). Staff perceptions were that automated dispensing machines improve knowledge of medications on imprest (p=0.03) and reduced medication retrieval time (p<0.01). Conclusions This study found that the medication retrieval process was slower with automated dispensing machines for Schedules 2, 3, 4 and unscheduled medications, but quicker for Schedule 8 and 11 medications in an Australian emergency and trauma centre. Although retrieving medications took slightly longer overall, staff believed automated dispensing machines save time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Roman et al. reported nursing efficiency savings resulting from a reduction in the time taken to retrieve CDs from ADCs whereby the requirement to document the transaction was removed as it was automatically captured in the ADC electronic CD register.
“Roman et al. reported nursing efficiency savings resulting from a reduction in the time taken to retrieve CDs from ADCs whereby the requirement to document the transaction was removed as it was automatically captured in the ADC electronic CD register.49”
From Benefits and challenges associated with implementation and ongoing use of automated dispensing cabinet for medicines: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
Cites
Gaieski, D. F., Mikkelsen, M. E., Band, R. A., Pines, J. M., Massone, R., Furia, F. F., Shofer, F. S., & Goyal, M. (2010) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181cc4824 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jung, Y. Y., Walsh, Á., Patel, J., & Lai, K. (2025) · Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100599 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“49 Pharmacy efficiency savings were described in terms of pharmacist and pharmacy technician time attributed to medicines management and distribution activities.”
- Authors
- Roman, C., Poole, S., Walker, C., Smit, D. V., & Dooley, M. J.
- Affiliations
- The Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Roman, Cristina
- Venue
- Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 112-117
- ISSN
- 1574-6267 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2301294339
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Keywords
- emergency department, medication administration, employee perceptions, controlled substances, drug scheduling, pharmacy automation
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Medical Staff, Hospital, Medication Errors, Medication Systems, Hospital, Pharmacy Service, Hospital, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Time Factors, Victoria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review