Intra-annual changes in biomass, carbon, and nitrogen dynamics at 4-year old switchgrass field trials in west Tennessee, USA
Abstract
Switchgrass is a potential bioenergy crop that could promote soil C sequestration in some environments. We compared four switchgrass cultivars on a well-drained Alfisol to test for differences in biomass, C, and N dynamics during the fourth growing season. There was no difference (P >0.05) among cultivars and no significant cultivar×time interaction in analyses of dry mass, C stocks, or N stocks in aboveground biomass and surface litter. At the end of the growing season, mean (±SE) aboveground biomass was 2.1±0.13kgm⁻², and surface litter dry mass was approximately 50% of aboveground biomass. Prior to harvest, the live root:shoot biomass ratio was 0.77. There was no difference (P >0.05) among cultivars for total biomass, C, and N stocks belowground. Total belowground biomass (90cm soil depth) as well as coarse (≥1mm diameter) and fine (<1mm diameter) live root biomass increased from April to October. Dead roots were <10% of live root biomass to a depth of 90cm. Net production of total belowground biomass (505±132gm⁻²) occurred in the last half of the growing season. The increase in total live belowground biomass (426±139gm⁻²) was more or less evenly divided among rhizomes, coarse, and fine roots. The N budget for annual switchgrass production was closely balanced with 6.3gNm⁻² removed by harvest of aboveground biomass and 6.7gNm⁻² supplied by fertilization. At the location of our study in west Tennessee, intra-annual changes in biomass, C, and N stocks belowground were potentially important to crop management for soil C sequestration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For switchgrass, more carbon was allocated to the roots than to the rhizomes.
“For switchgrass, more C was allocated to the roots than to the rhizomes [25, 66, 71].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [71]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Garten, C. T., Smith, J. L., Tyler, D. D., Amonette, J. E., Bailey, V. L., Brice, D. J., Castro, H. F., Graham, R. L., Gunderson, C. A., Izaurralde, R. C., Jardine, P. M., Jastrow, J. D., Kerley, M. K., Matamala, R., Mayes, M. A., Metting, F. B., Miller, R. M., Moran, K. K., Post, W. M., Sands, R. D., Schadt, C. W., Phillips, J. R., Thomson, A. M., Vugteveen, T., West, T. O., & Wullschleger, S. D.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- United States Department of Agriculture (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
- Joint Global Change Research Institute (US)
- Argonne National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garten, C.T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 177-184
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054941749
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Science
- Biological and Environmental Research
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Keywords
- switchgrass, energy crops, soil carbon sequestration, belowground biomass, root biomass, rhizome, nitrogen balance, aboveground biomass, surface litter, Alfisol, cultivar comparison, intra-annual dynamics, nitrogen stocks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review