Cited by 635Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationSoil erosion and sediment transport

Roots contribute more to refractory soil organic matter than above-ground crop residues, as revealed by a long-term field experiment

Kätterer, Thomas, Bolinder, Martin Anders, Andrén, Olof, Kirchmann, Holger, Menichetti, Lorenzo·2011·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

We revisited the well documented and ongoing long-term ‘Ultuna continuous soil organic matter field experiment’ which started in 1956 at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. The objective of the experiment is to quantify effects of six organic amendments and mineral N fertilizers on the crop and soil. We used the ‘equivalent soil mass’ concept for estimating changes in the topsoil carbon stocks in all 15 treatments. C inputs from amendments were measured and those from crops were calculated using allometric functions and crop yields. Clustering C inputs into seven categories by quality allowed us to calculate a ‘humification’ coefficient for each category. Here, these coefficients were simply based on the fraction of total C input that still remains in the topsoil after about 50years. As indicated by previous studies, this coefficient was highest for peat, followed by sewage sludge, manure, sawdust and above-ground crop residues. The most interesting result from the current investigation is that the optimized coefficient for root-derived carbon was about 2.3 times higher than that for above-ground plant residues. The calculated results were found to be robust in a sensitivity analysis. Our findings strongly support the hypothesis that root-derived carbon contributes more to relatively stable soil C pools than the same amount of above-crop residue-derived C.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.029

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kätterer, T., Bolinder, M. A., Andrén, O., Kirchmann, H., & Menichetti, L.
Affiliations
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
Kätterer, Thomas
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
141
Issue
1-2
Pages
184-192
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982311706
Cited by
635
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
35.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
root-derived carbon, soil organic matter, humification, crop residues, organic amendments, mineral nitrogen fertilizer, topsoil carbon stocks, peat, sewage sludge, manure, sawdust, long-term field experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review