Cited by 497Pasture and Agricultural SystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology

Grazing management impacts on vegetation, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie

Teague, W.R., Dowhower, S.L., Baker, S.A., Haile, N., DeLaune, P.B., Conover, D.M.·2011·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

To assess whether adaptive management using multi-paddock grazing is superior to continuous grazing regarding conservation and restoration of resources we evaluated the impact of multi-paddock (MP) grazing at a high stocking rate compared to light continuous (LC) and heavy continuous (HC) grazing on neighboring commercial ranches in each of three proximate counties in north Texas tall grass prairie. The same management had been conducted on all ranches for at least the previous 9 years. Impact on soils and vegetation was compared to ungrazed areas (EX) in two of the counties. MP grazing was managed using light to moderate defoliation during the growing season followed by adequate recovery before regrazing after approximately 40 days and 80 days during fast and slow growing conditions, respectively. The vegetation was dominated by high seral grasses with MP grazing and EX, and dominated by short grasses and forbs with HC grazing. LC grazing had a lower proportion of high seral grasses than MP grazing or EX. Bare ground was higher on HC than LC, MP and EX, while soil aggregate stability was higher with MP than HC grazing but not LC grazing and EX. Soil penetration resistance was lowest with MP grazing and EX and highest with HC grazing. Bulk density did not differ among grazing management categories. Infiltration rate did not differ among grazing management categories but sediment loss was higher with HC than the other grazing management categories. Soil organic matter and cati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies using adaptive multi-paddock grazing indicate that it can result in more ideal pasture species composition (more digestible forages with greater digestible energy content) due to prevention of consistent species selection and overgrazing, providing pasture recovery, and re-grazing before lignification.

    “Studies using AMP grazing indicate that it can result in more ideal pasture species composition (more digestible forages with greater digestible energy content) due to prevention of consistent species selection and overgrazing, providing pasture recovery, and re-grazing before lignification”
  • The short-duration, high-intensity grazing used in this system has been shown to maximize plant residue left in the pasture and improve below-ground soil C allocation via plant roots.

    “Further, the short-duration, high-intensity grazing (otherwise termed HPG; as well as rotation with other animals) used in this system has been shown to maximize plant residue left in the pasture and improve below-ground soil C allocation via plant roots (Teague et al., 2011).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 143 · Cited by 497

Authors
Teague, W. R., Dowhower, S. L., Baker, S. A., Haile, N., DeLaune, P. B., & Conover, D. M.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University System (US)
Corresponding author
Teague, W.R.
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
141
Issue
3-4
Pages
310-322
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120254670
Cited by
497
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
39.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Keywords
continuous grazing, tallgrass prairie, adaptive management, grazing intensity, soil aggregate stability, soil penetration resistance, soil organic matter, cation exchange capacity, fungal to bacterial ratio, floristic composition, bare ground, sediment loss, infiltration rate, water holding capacity, prairie conservation, North Texas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review