Cited by 251Agricultural Science and FertilizationPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesSoil Management and Crop Yield

Understanding variability in crop response to fertilizer and amendments in sub-Saharan Africa

Open access
Kihara, Job, Nziguheba, Generose, Zingore, Shamie, Coulibaly, Adama, Esilaba, Anthony, Kabambe, Vernon, Njoroge, Samuel, Palm, Cheryl +1 more·2016·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

Improved understanding of soil fertility factors limiting crop productivity is important to develop appropriate soil and nutrient management recommendations in sub-Saharan Africa. Diagnostic trials were implemented in Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Nigeria and Tanzania, as part of the African Soils Information Service (AfSIS) project, to identify soil fertility constraints to crop production across various cropping systems and soil fertility conditions. In each country, one to three sites of 10 km × 10 km were included with each site having 12-31 field trials. The treatments tested included a control, an NPK treatment, three treatments in which the N, P and K nutrients were omitted one at a time from the NPK treatment, and three treatments in which secondary and micronutrients (Ca, Mg, S, Zn and B) simply referred here as multi-nutrients, manure and lime were added to the NPK. The field trials were conducted for 1-2 seasons; the test crop was maize except in Mali where sorghum was used. Nitrogen was limiting in all sites and generally the most limiting nutrient except in Sidindi (Kenya) and Kontela (Mali) where P was the most limiting. The general pattern in Kiberashi (Tanzania) shows none of the nutrients were limiting. K is mainly limiting in only one site (Mbinga) although incidences of K limitation were seen in almost all sites. Addition of multi-nutrients and manure further improved the yields of NPK in most sites. Cluster analyses revealed that maize crop in 11% of fields were highly responsive to nitrogen application, 25% (i.e., 21% poor and 4% fertile) 'non-responsive' to any nutrient or soil amendment, 28% being 'low responsive' and 36% of 'intermediate response'. This study indicates that constraints to crop production vary considerably even within a site, and that addressing limitations in secondary and micronutrients, and increasing soil carbon can improve response to fertilizers. For sustainable crop production intensification in smallholder farming systems in SSA, there is need to develop management strategies to improve efficiency of fertilizer use and of other inputs, recognizing the site-specific nutrient response patterns at various spatial scales.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kihara, J., Nziguheba, G., Zingore, S., Coulibaly, A., Esilaba, A., Kabambe, V., Njoroge, S., Palm, C., & Huising, J.
Affiliations
  • International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (KE)
  • Institut d'Économie Rurale (ML)
  • Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KE)
  • Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources (MW)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (NG)
Corresponding author
Kihara, Job
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
229
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2400453662
Cited by
251
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bill and Mellida Gates Foundation (BMGF)
  • Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)
  • International Center for Tropical Agriculture, CIAT
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
soil fertility constraints, fertilizer response, nitrogen limitation, phosphorus limitation, potassium limitation, manure, lime, maize, sorghum, spatial variability, site-specific nutrient management, smallholder farming, sub-Saharan Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review