Long-term effects of grass-clover leys on the structure of a silt loam soil in a cold climate
Open accessAbstract
Grass/legume leys are commonly included in the crop rotation in mixed farming systems in cold or humid regions in order to sustain the supply of nutrients and maintain soil fertility. Leys are also known to sequester soil organic carbon and also improve the structural stability and mechanical properties of soil. However, few studies have investigated the long-term effects of ley rotations on the architectural properties of the structural pore space in soil. We investigated the effects of grass/clover leys on soil structure in the topsoil and upper subsoil of a silt loam in a long-term field trial established in 1956 at Offer in northern Sweden. This experiment includes four treatments with varying proportions of ley (1, 2, 3 or 5 years) in 6-year rotations. We used X-ray tomography to quantify topsoil structural pore space at a resolution of 65 μm in the first year of arable cropping following the ley break, a few weeks after sowing in spring. Earthworm populations were quantified by both hand-sorting and chemical extraction, while near-saturated infiltration was measured as a proxy for soil structure in the upper subsoil. In the topsoil, the treatments with a greater proportion of ley had larger organic carbon contents, smaller bulk densities and larger porosities. However, effects of crop rotation on the pore space were limited to pores smaller than 65 μm, as no treatment effects were found for the volume, size distribution, connectivity or complexity of the X-ray imaged pore space, even though the grass-clover leys promoted larger numbers and biomass of topsoil-dwelling earthworm species. Furthermore, no positive effects of grass/clover leys on organic carbon content and soil structure were found in the subsoil. The macropore infiltration capacity in upper subsoil was generally very small (overall median value of 3 mm h −1 ) indicating a lack of functional macroporosity below plough depth. Consistent with these results, no individuals of deep-burrowing earthworm species were found at the site, while previous observations showed only shallow rooting, both of which are attributed to the cold climate and poor subsoil drainage.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Roughage feed production on cropland contributes to soil carbon sequestration.
“In addition, roughage feed production on cropland contributes to soil carbon sequestration (Börjesson et al., 2018;Jarvis et al., 2017;Tidåker et al., 2014).”
From Time-dependent climate impact of beef production – can carbon sequestration in soil offset enteric methane emissions? (2022) · cites this paper as Jarvis et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: Implications for C-saturation of soils
Six, J., Conant, R. T., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2002) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1016125726789 · Cited by 4,633 · see citing works
Carbon cycling and sequestration opportunities in temperate grasslands
Soussana, J.-F., Soussana, J.-F., Loiseau, P., Vuichard, N., Ceschia, E., Balesdent, J., Chevallier, T., & Arrouays, D. (2004) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1079/sum2003234 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Bertrand, M., Barot, S., Blouin, M., Whalen, J., de Oliveira, T., Roger-Estrade, J., 2015. Earthworm services for cropping systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 553-567.
- Ericson, L., Mattsson, L., 2000. Soil and crop management impact on SOC and physical properties of soils in northern Sweden. In: Lal, R., Kimble, J.M., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.), Global Climate Change and Cold Regions Ecosystems. Advances in Soil Science, CRC Press, pp. 123-135.
- Helliwell, J.R., Sturrock, C.J., Grayling, K.M., Tracy, S.R., Flavel, R.J., Young, I.M., Whalley, W.R., Mooney, S.J., 2013. Applications of X-ray computed tomography for examining biophysical interactions and structural development in soil systems: a review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 64, 279-297.
- Jarvis, N., Koestel, J., Larsbo, M., 2016. Understanding preferential flow in the vadose zone: recent advances and future prospects. Vadose Zone J. 15. http://dx.doi.org/10. 2136/vzj2016.09.00. Jarvis, N., Larsbo, M., Koestel, J., 2017. Connectivity and percolation of structural pore networks in a cultivated silt loam soil quantified by X-ray tomography. Geoderma 287, 71-79. · DOI
- Jarvis, N.J., 2007. Review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles: controlling factors and consequences for water quality. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58, 523-546.
- Koestel, J., 2017. SoilJ: an ImageJ plugin for the semi-automatic processing of 3-D X-ray images of soils. Vadose Zone J.. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.03.0062. (accepted for publication). · DOI
- Meyer, E., 1996. Methods in soil zoology. In: Schinner, F., Öhlinger, R., Kandeler, E., Margesin, R. (Eds.), Methods in Soil Biology. Springer LAB Manual, Springer Verlag Berlin, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 313-382.
- Murphy, B.W., 2015. Impact of soil organic matter on soil properties: a review with emphasis on Australian soils. Soil Res. 53, 605-635.
- Ohser, J., Mücklich, F., 2000. Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science. J. Wiley and Sons 404 pp.
- Otsu, N., 1979. Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syste. Man Cybern. 9, 62-66.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hammar, T., Hansson, P.-A., & Röös, E. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129948 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jarvis, N., Forkman, J., Koestel, J., Kätterer, T., Larsbo, M., & Taylor, A.
- Affiliations
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Jarvis, Nicholas
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 247
- Pages
- 319-328
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2735798339
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Swedish Research Council FORMAS
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Keywords
- grass-clover ley, soil structure, silt loam soil, cold climate, earthworm population, soil organic carbon, soil porosity, macroporosity, subsurface drainage, crop rotation, X-ray tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review