Cited by 91Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil erosion and sediment transport

Soil carbon storage and mineralization rates are affected by carbon inputs rather than physical disturbance: Evidence from a 47-year tillage experiment

Open access
Mary, Bruno, Clivot, Hugues, Blaszczyk, Nicolas, Labreuche, Jérôme, Ferchaud, Fabien·2020·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

In spite of the large number of studies conducted on the drivers of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, there is still no consensus on the impact of tillage on the distribution and turnover rate of SOC in the soil profile. Few studies have characterized precisely the turnover of SOC using ¹³C natural tracing or simulated the SOC evolution per soil layer. In this study, we combined several approaches (diachronic analysis of SOC stocks, isotopic tracing and modelling) for characterizing the SOC evolution per soil layer in one of the oldest tillage experiments comparing no-till (NT), shallow till (ST) and full inversion tillage (FIT) combined with six crop managements. The new measurements made in 2017 reported in this paper confirm that i) tillage had no effect on SOC stocks integrated over the old ploughed layer (∼0−28 cm) or deeper (∼0−58 cm) and ii) reduced tillage affected the SOC distribution in the soil profile, with SOC storage in the upper layer (∼0−10 cm) offset by a SOC loss in the underlying layer (∼10−28 cm). The change in rotation (from C4 to C3 crops) in two crop management treatments allowed to quantify the decrease in C4 stocks during 19 years and calculate the specific mineralization rates relative to tillage treatments and soil layers. The mineralization rates did not vary significantly between tillage treatments in the whole (old) ploughed layer (∼0−28 cm) but varied according to depth and tillage. The highest rates were found in the layer 0−5 cm of NT or ST and the lowest rates in the layer 10−28 cm of the same tillage treatments. The rates were highly correlated with estimated C inputs and particulate organic matter contents in each layer, but not with tillage intensity. The evolution of total SOC and C4 stocks of each soil layer was simulated with AMG model during 47 years. The standard model (with a single mineralization rate) gave a good prediction of SOC evolution when applied to the whole profile (∼0−28 cm) but not for each individual layer. Including a relationship between C input and mineralization rate in the model allowed to well simulate the SOC evolution in all soil layers. This study shows that the main effect of a change in tillage on SOC storage is the change in the distribution of C input throughout the profile and the corresponding variation of the priming effect rather than the change in physical soil disturbance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106972

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 91

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Labreuche, J., Duval, R., Bureau, S., et al., 2018. Synthesis of a 47-year old field experiment in France, comparing soil tillage techniques in different crop rotations. ISTRO Paris, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16398.00324 · DOI
  2. Meurer, K.H.E., Haddaway, N.R., Bolinder, M.A., Kätterer, T., 2007. Tillage intensity affects total SOC stocks in boreo-temperate regions only in the topsoil-A systematic review using an ESM approach. Earth Science Reviews 177, 613-622.
  3. Powlson, D.S., Stirling, C.M., Jat, M.L., Gerard, B.G., Palm, C.A., et al., 2014. Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 4, 678-683. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2292 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Mary, B., Clivot, H., Blaszczyk, N., Labreuche, J., & Ferchaud, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Arvalis - Institut du Végétal (FR)
Corresponding author
Mary, Bruno
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
299
Pages
106972
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027304222
Cited by
91
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon, tillage, soil carbon mineralization, carbon input, soil depth, no-tillage, shallow tillage, particulate organic matter, priming effect, soil carbon stocks, long-term tillage experiment, crop management, soil disturbance, carbon sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review