The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining strategies to improve the carbon balance of corn/soybean agriculture using eddy covariance and mass balance techniques
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 1×
“West and Post (2002) have analyzed a large number of longterm tillage trials in which changes in soil organic matter have been measured and conclude that conversion from moldboard plowing to no-till can sequester 57 14 g C m 2 per year.”
Background
Cited by
Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know?
Baker, J. M., Ochsner, T. E., Venterea, R. T., & Griffis, T. J. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.014 · Cited by 1,252
Self-citationBaldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, J. M., & Griffis, T. J.
- Venue
- Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 163-177
- ISSN
- 0168-1923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163209547
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining strategies to improve the carbon balance of corn/soybean agriculture using eddy covariance and mass balance techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.005
- The paper
- Baker, J. M., & Griffis, T. J. (2005). Examining strategies to improve the carbon balance of corn/soybean agriculture using eddy covariance and mass balance techniques. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
