The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of sap flux-based evapotranspiration estimates with catchment-scale water balance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bosch, J. M., & Hewlett, J. D. (1982) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2 · Cited by 2,567
Cited by
Intermediate tree cover can maximize groundwater recharge in the seasonally dry tropics
Ilstedt, U., Bargués Tobella, A., Bazié, H. R., Bayala, J., Verbeeten, E., Nyberg, G., Sanou, J., Benegas, L., Murdiyarso, D., Laudon, H., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21930 · Cited by 319
Oishi, A. C., Oren, R., & Stoy, P. C. (2008) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.06.013 · Cited by 296
A general predictive model for estimating monthly ecosystem evapotranspiration
Sun, G., Alstad, K., Chen, J., Chen, S., Ford, C. R., Lin, G., Liu, C., Lu, N., McNulty, S. G., Miao, H., et al. (2011) · Ecohydrology · doi:10.1002/eco.194 · Cited by 271
Self-citationEvapotranspiration and ecosystem water use efficiency of switchgrass and high biomass sorghum
Wagle, P., Kakani, V. G., & Huhnke, R. L. (2016) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2015.0149 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, C. R., Hubbard, R. M., Kloeppel, B. D., & Vose, J. M.
- Venue
- Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 176-185
- ISSN
- 0168-1923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099508256
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of sap flux-based evapotranspiration estimates with catchment-scale water balance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.010
- The paper
- Ford, C. R., Hubbard, R. M., Kloeppel, B. D., & Vose, J. M. (2007). A comparison of sap flux-based evapotranspiration estimates with catchment-scale water balance. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
