The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of the near-surface evaporation zone and corresponding effects on the surface energy balance of a drying bare soil
Abstract
Despite a long history of application to bare soils drying by evaporation, the implications of the coupled heat and moisture transfer theory of Philip and de Vries for temperature and moisture regimes near the soil surface have not been fully described, either because grid resolutions used within the soil in numerical implementations were inadequate and/or research objectives were focussed elsewhere. In this paper, a finite-element numerical simulation of heat and moisture regimes using the original theory of Philip and de Vries is applied to a bare silt-loam soil drying during a 10-d rain-free period that occurred at the end of a 66-d field study at Agassiz, British Columbia. The unique aspect of the simulation is that the grid resolution is more than adequate to correctly determine the reported location, magnitude, and shape of the subsurface evaporation zone that develops during daytime for many of the days and corresponding effects on surface energy balance components and soil temperature and moisture.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Soil depth and meteorological factors such as net radiation, air pressure, windspeed, and the rate of change of the saturation vapor pressure versus temperature are factors in the magnitude of the evaporation flux”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Novak, 2010
In the citing paper
“evaporation acts in the topmost soil layers, with most evaporation occurring under 20 mm (Heitman et al., 2010; Novak, 2010; Philip, 1957; Tamai, 1998).”
From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Novak, 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bodus, B., O'Malley, K., Dieter, G., Gunawardana, C., & McDonald, W. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167195 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Novak, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Novak, Michael D.
- ORCID
- Novak, Michael D.
- Venue
- Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09-15
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1358-1365
- ISSN
- 0168-1923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004809248
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Keywords
- surface energy balance, heat and moisture transfer, soil temperature, soil moisture, silt loam soil, finite element analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review