Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Environmental income is not more important to female-headed households.
“We do not find support for the claim that environmental income is more important to households that are female headed (c.f. Babulo et al. (2008); see also Sunderland et al. (2014) for further discussion).”
From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Babulo et al. (2008)
Environmental income is more important to less-educated households.
“In general, we find support for environmental income being more important to households with young household heads (c.f. McElwee, 2008), to large households (in contrast to Mamo et al., 2007 who found the opposite in their case study), and to less-educated households (e.g., Babulo et al., 2008; Mamo et al., 2007; Vedeld et al., 2007).”
From Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014) · cites this paper as Babulo et al., 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis
Angelsen, A., Jagger, P., Babigumira, R., Belcher, B., Hogarth, N. J., Bauch, S., Börner, J., Smith-Hall, C., & Wunder, S. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
- Authors
- Babulo, B., Muys, B., Nega, F., Tollens, E., Nyssen, J., Deckers, J., & Mathijs, E.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Mathijs, Erik
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-155
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037337590
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- household livelihood strategies, forest dependence, forest products, livelihood assets, rural livelihoods, environmental income, asset endowments, Tigray highlands
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
