A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Design methods and tools are used as boundary objects to structure mutual exchange between actors and researchers, to stimulate innovative thinking among participants, and to facilitate knowledge flows between diverse actors.
“They are used as boundary objects to structure mutual exchange between actors and researchers, to stimulate innovative thinking among participants (Duru 2013; Jakku and Thorburn 2010) and to facilitate knowledge flows between diverse actors (Berthet etal. 2018).”
From Designing agroecological systems across scales: a new analytical framework (2022) · cites this paper as Jakku and Thorburn 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 204
- Authors
- Jakku, E., & Thorburn, P. J.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Thorburn, P.J.
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 675-682
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079479546
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 31.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Sugar Research and Development Corporation
- Örebro Universitet
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
- Keywords
- participatory development, agricultural decision support, conceptual framework, technological frames, interpretative flexibility, boundary objects, social learning, co-learning, stakeholder collaboration, irrigation scheduling, sugarcane production, technology adoption, science and technology studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
