Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system

Ishfaq, Muhammad, Farooq, Muhammad, Zulfiqar, Usman, Hussain, Saddam, Akbar, Nadeem, Nawaz, Ahmad, Anjum, Shakeel Ahmad·2020·Agricultural Water Management

Abstract

Abstract Global warming and declining water resources are threatening the sustainability of rice production and global food security. Conventional continuously flooded system (CF) of rice production is a major contributor to rice production but it requires a huge amount of water input and poses a severe threat to the ecosystem due to emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and accumulation of heavy metals [e.g., arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg)] in the rice grains. The declining soil health, increasing micronutrient deficiencies, and declining organic matter are are also threatening the long term sustainability of the conventional rice production system. In this scenario, alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation system is a promising, water-saving, economically viable, and ecofriendly alternative to CF. In this review, we discuss the influence of AWD on nutrient dynamics, rice growth, and yield formation, grain quality, water use efficiency, emission of GHGs, and economics in comparison with the CF rice production system. Overall, AWD irrigation technique can reduce the total water inputs (25–70 %), CH4 emission (11–95 %), As (13–90 %), and Hg (5–90 %) in rice grains while maintaining similar or better paddy yield (10−20%) than the CF depending upon weather conditions, soil type, degree of dryness, crop duration and crop growth stage. The mild-AWD improves the rice grain quality by reducing the kernel chalkiness (40 %) and increasing the head rice recovery (6%) and concentration of grain micronutrients (like zinc). Being economically viable and environment friendly, AWD system is being adopted in all major rice producing regions but not widely, possibly due to complicated inter-relations of agricultural and socioeconomic systems, and lack of institutional support.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106363

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Ishfaq, M., Farooq, M., Zulfiqar, U., Hussain, S., Akbar, N., Nawaz, A., & Anjum, S. A.
Venue
Agricultural Water Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
241
Pages
106363
ISSN
0378-3774 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3049696400
Cited by
261
References
3
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106363
The paper
Ishfaq, M., Farooq, M., Zulfiqar, U., Hussain, S., Akbar, N., Nawaz, A., & Anjum, S. A. (2020). Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system. Agricultural Water Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106363

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.