The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system
Abstract
Abstract Global warming and declining water resources are threatening the sustainability of rice production and global food security. Conventional continuously flooded system (CF) of rice production is a major contributor to rice production but it requires a huge amount of water input and poses a severe threat to the ecosystem due to emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and accumulation of heavy metals [e.g., arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg)] in the rice grains. The declining soil health, increasing micronutrient deficiencies, and declining organic matter are are also threatening the long term sustainability of the conventional rice production system. In this scenario, alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation system is a promising, water-saving, economically viable, and ecofriendly alternative to CF. In this review, we discuss the influence of AWD on nutrient dynamics, rice growth, and yield formation, grain quality, water use efficiency, emission of GHGs, and economics in comparison with the CF rice production system. Overall, AWD irrigation technique can reduce the total water inputs (25–70 %), CH4 emission (11–95 %), As (13–90 %), and Hg (5–90 %) in rice grains while maintaining similar or better paddy yield (10−20%) than the CF depending upon weather conditions, soil type, degree of dryness, crop duration and crop growth stage. The mild-AWD improves the rice grain quality by reducing the kernel chalkiness (40 %) and increasing the head rice recovery (6%) and concentration of grain micronutrients (like zinc). Being economically viable and environment friendly, AWD system is being adopted in all major rice producing regions but not widely, possibly due to complicated inter-relations of agricultural and socioeconomic systems, and lack of institutional support.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems
Ju, X.-T., Xing, G.-X., Chen, X.-P., Zhang, S.-L., Zhang, L.-J., Liu, X.-J., Cui, Z.-L., Yin, B., Christie, P., Zhu, Z.-L., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0813417106 · Cited by 2,599
Zhao, F.-J., McGrath, S. P., & Meharg, A. A. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112152 · Cited by 1,246
Cited by
The fingerprints of climate warming on cereal crops phenology and adaptation options
Fatima, Z., Ahmed, M., Hussain, M., Abbas, G., Ul-Allah, S., Ahmad, S., Ahmed, N., Ali, M. A., Sarwar, G., Haque, E. U., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74740-3 · Cited by 281
Self-citationGlobal Sustainable Water Management: A Systematic Qualitative Review
Hasan, N., Pushpalatha, R., Manivasagam, V. S., Arlikatti, S., & Cibin, R. (2023) · Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s11269-023-03604-y · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishfaq, M., Farooq, M., Zulfiqar, U., Hussain, S., Akbar, N., Nawaz, A., & Anjum, S. A.
- Venue
- Agricultural Water Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 241
- Pages
- 106363
- ISSN
- 0378-3774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3049696400
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106363
- The paper
- Ishfaq, M., Farooq, M., Zulfiqar, U., Hussain, S., Akbar, N., Nawaz, A., & Anjum, S. A. (2020). Alternate wetting and drying: A water-saving and ecofriendly rice production system. Agricultural Water Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.