Cited by 1,008Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Clinical classification schemes for predicting hemorrhage: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (NRAF)

Gage, Brian F., Yan, Yan, Milligan, Paul E., Waterman, Amy D., Culverhouse, Robert, Rich, Michael W., Radford, Martha J.·2006·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Background Although warfarin and other anticoagulants can prevent ischemic events, they can cause hemorrhage. Quantifying the rate of hemorrhage is crucial for determining the risks and net benefits of prescribing antithrombotic therapy. Our objective was to find a bleeding classification scheme that could quantify the risk of hemorrhage in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.Methods We combined bleeding risk factors from existing classification schemes into a new scheme, HEMORR2HAGES, and validated all bleeding classification schemes. We scored HEMORR2HAGES by adding 2 points for a prior bleed and 1 point for each of the other risk factors: hepatic or renal disease, ethanol abuse, malignancy, older (age > 75 years), reduced platelet count or function, hypertension (uncontrolled), anemia, genetic factors, excessive fall risk, and stroke. We used data from quality improvement organizations representing 7 states to assemble a registry of 3791 Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation.Results There were 162 hospital admissions with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code for hemorrhage. With each additional point, the rate of bleeding per 100 patient-years of warfarin increased: 1.9 for 0, 2.5 for 1, 5.3 for 2, 8.4 for 3, 10.4 for 4, and 12.3 for > or =5 points. In patients prescribed warfarin, HEMORR2HAGES had greater predictive accuracy (c statistic 0.67) than other bleed prediction schemes (P < .001).Conclusions Adaptations of existing classification schemes, especially a new bleeding risk scheme, HEMORR2HAGES, can quantify the risk of hemorrhage and aid in the management of antithrombotic therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.04.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 1,008

Authors
Gage, B. F., Yan, Y., Milligan, P. E., Waterman, A. D., Culverhouse, R., Rich, M. W., & Radford, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Gage, Brian F.
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
151
Issue
3
Pages
713-719
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119221555
Cited by
1,008
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 102 · 2012: 85
FWCI
16.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS10133)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, bleeding risk, warfarin, antithrombotic therapy, elderly patients, bleeding risk prediction, risk stratification, Medicare beneficiaries
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Female, Hemorrhage, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Registries, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review